Volume 1, Number 2 (June 2015)                   mazu-cmm 2015, 1(2): 31-38 | Back to browse issues page



DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.cmm.1.2.31
PMID: 28680986
PMCID: PMC5490311

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Haghani I, Amirinia F, Nowroozpoor Dailami K, Shokohi T. Detection of fungi by conventional methods and semi-nested PCR in patients with presumed fungal keratitis. mazu-cmm. 2015; 1 (2) :31-38
URL: http://cmm.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-36-en.html

Abstract:   (2175 Views)

Background and Purpose: Fungal keratitis is a suppurative, ulcerative, and sight-threatening infection of the cornea that sometimes leads to blindness. The aims of this study were: recuperating facilities for laboratory diagnosis, determining the causative microorganisms, and comparing conventional laboratory diagnostic tools and semi-nested PCR. Materials and Methods: Sampling was conducted in patients with suspected fungal keratitis. Two corneal scrapings specimens, one for direct smear and culture and the other for semi- nested PCR were obtained. Results: Of the 40 expected cases of mycotic keratitis, calcofluor white staining showed positivity in 25%, culture in 17.5%, KOH in 10%, and semi-nested PCR in 27.5%. The sensitivities of semi-nested PCR, KOH, and CFW were 57.1%, 28.5%, and 42% while the specificities were 78.7%, 94%, and 78.7%, respectively. The time taken for PCR assay was 4 to 8 hours, whereas positive fungal cultures took at least 5 to 7 days. Conclusion: Due to the increasing incidence of fungal infections in people with weakened immune systems, uninformed using of topical corticosteroids and improper use of contact lens, fast diagnosis and accurate treatment of keratomycosis seems to be essential. Therefore, according to the current study, molecular methods can detect mycotic keratitis early and correctly leading to appropriate treatment.

Full-Text [PDF 848 kb]   (761 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Articles | Subject: Medical Mycology
Received: 2014/10/7 | Accepted: 2014/12/16 | Published: 2015/05/31

Add your comments about this article : Your username or email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author


© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Current Medical Mycology