Volume 1, Number 4 (December 2015)                   mazu-cmm 2015, 1(4): 7-12 | Back to browse issues page



DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.cmm.1.4.7

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abastabar M, Shokohi T, Rouhi Kord R, Badali H, Hashemi S J, Ghasemi Z, et al . In vitro activity of econazole in comparison with three common antifungal agents against clinical Candida strains isolated from superficial infections. mazu-cmm. 2015; 1 (4) :7-12
URL: http://cmm.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-81-en.html

Abstract:   (1575 Views)

Background and Purpose: Candida species are the most common organisms involved in superficial fungal infections, worldwide. Although econazole is among the most frequently used topical formulations for the treatment of candidiasis, no information is available regarding the susceptibility profiles of Candida species in Iran.
Materials and Methods: In vitro susceptibility of 100 clinical Candida isolates belonging to 6 species from superficial candidiasis of Iran towards to econazole was compared with three other common antifungal agents including itraconazole, fluconazole, and miconazole. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) values were analyzed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M38-A3 document. All isolates were previously identified to the species level, using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) on ITS region.
Results: The MIC of econazole, itraconazole, miconazole, and fluconazole were within the range of 0.016-16, 0.032-16, 0.016-16, and 0.25-64 AWT IMAGEg/ml, respectively. In general, econazole and miconazole were more active against Candida isolates, compared to the other two agents.
Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that for Candida albicans isolates, miconazole and econazole had the best effect, but in non-albicans Candida species, itraconazole and miconazole displayed more activity than other antifungal agents.

Full-Text [PDF 789 kb]   (595 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Articles | Subject: Medical Mycology
Received: 2016/03/1 | Accepted: 2016/03/1 | Published: 2016/03/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author


© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Current Medical Mycology