Chemical compositions and antifungal activities of Satureja macrosiphon against Candida and Aspergillus species

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

1 Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

3 Basic Sciences in Infectious Diseases Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

4 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

5 Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Despite the various applications of Satureja species, there are limited data in this domain. Regarding this, the present study was conducted to investigate the essential oil (EO) biological activity of S. macrosiphon species in Iran.
Materials and Methods: The EO of S. macrosiphon flowers was obtained by hydrodistillation. Chemical compositions of the EO were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. In addition, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were measured by means of the broth microdilution method. The estimation of antibiofilm and cytotoxic activities was also accomplished using the tetrazolium salt and MTT assays, respectively.
Results: A total of 26 components were identified in the EO with linalool as the main constituent (28.46%). A MIC range value of 0.25-8 μL/mL was obtained against all of the tested fungi. The EO inhibited the biofilm development of the Candida tested strains at a concentration of 4-8 μL/mL. Cytotoxicity (IC50) of EO against the HeLa cell was greater than the MIC concentration (6.49 μL/mL).
Conclusion: Based on the findings, it was concluded that the EO of S. macrosiphon has the potential for further use as an antifungal agent.

Keywords


Introduction

During the past two decades, there has been a growth in the population of the immunocompromised patients vulnerable to invasive fungal infections. This rise is mostly due to the adoption of novel treatments, such as hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation, coupled with the use of newer and more potent chemotherapeutic and immunomodulatory agents (1-4). Among different species, Candida and Aspergillus are the most prevalent fungal pathogenic agents responsible for the majority of the infections (5).

Candida species are considered as the main cause of nosocomial fungal infections (almost 80%) (6). Although C. albicans are still responsible for the majority of the candidiasis cases and rank seventh among all hospital pathogens, the number of infections caused by non-albicans Candida species is also increasing (7). Accordingly, almost 50% of bloodstream infections in surgical and neonatal intensive care units are caused by non-albicans Candida (8). In addition, Aspergillus species is responsible for 1.3% of fungal nosocomial infections (9). The incidence of Aspergillus infection appears to be much higher in special care wards, such as bone marrow transplant units (10). More than 95% of aspergillosis cases are caused by A. fumigatus and A. flavus (11).

The emergence of resistance in these saprophytic fungi responsible for invasive fungal infections has complicated their treatment (12). In this regard, there are several reports describing in vitro and clinical resistance to azole and echinocandins among Candida and Aspergillus species (13-15). In the face of increasing resistance to antifungal drugs, natural products and phytochemicals are being widely screened as the potential sources of novel antifungal agents (16-18). Traditionally, plants have been used to prevent and cure infectious diseases. As part of plant defense mechanisms against microbial pathogens, they produce aromatic chemicals and secondary metabolites. Among these secondary metabolites, essential oils (EOs) obtained by the hydrodistillation of the plants are known to have antimicrobial activities.

Satureja is a genus of the well-known medicinal plant of Lamiaceae family and comprises numerous species growing wild in the Mediterranean region (19). The EO isolated from various species of Satureja has been shown to have biological and pharmacological activities, such as antibacterial (20), fungicidal (21), antiviral (22), and antioxidant (23). The genus Satureja embraces over 30 species growing in the eastern parts of Mediterranean region. Fourteen species of this genus are growing wild in the western, central, and northern parts of Iran, among which S. macrosiphon is one of the endemic species in this country. The present study was conducted to determine the chemical constituents of S. macrosiphon EO. This study also involved the investigation of the antifungal, antibiofilm, and cytotoxic activities of this EO against the different species of Candida and Aspergillus.

Materials and Methods

Plant material and essential oil preparation

Flowers of species were used for the analysis of EO composition. To this end, 50 g of dried flowers was subjected to hydrodistillation for 3 h using a Clevenger-type apparatus to produce oil. The obtained EO was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and stored in sealed vials at low temperature (4°C) before analysis.

Essential oil analysis and identification procedure

The chemical composition of EO was determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using a CP-SIL 5HP fused silica column. The GC (Trace GC ULTRA, Thermo Fischer) analysis was performed using a flame ionization detector (GCFID) with a Varian capillary column (CP-SIL 5HP, length of 60 m, diameter of 0.25 mm, and film thickness of 0.25 μm). The column temperature was programmed at 60-280°C for 4°C/min. Furthermore, the temperature of the injector was fixed at 250°C. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.1 mL/min and a split ratio of 1/50. The quadrupole mass spectrometer was scanned over 35-465 amu with an ionizing voltage of 70 eV and an ionization current of 150 mA. The GCFID analysis of the oil was conducted using a Thermoquest-Finnigan instrument equipped with a DB-5 fused silica column (60 m×0.25 mm, film thickness of 0.25 mm).

Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow of 1.1 mL/min, and the split ratio was the same as that used for GC-MS. The oven temperature was raised from 60°C to 250°C at a rate of 4°C/min and held for 10 min. The injector and detector (FID) temperatures were kept at 250°C and 280°C, respectively. Semi-quantitative data were obtained from FID area percentages without the use of correction factors. Retention indexes (RIs) were calculated using the retention times of n-alkanes (C6-C24) that were injected at the same temperature and conditions. The compounds were identified by comparing their RI with those reported in the literature, and their mass spectrum was compared with those reported in the Wiley Library (24).

Fungal strain

The antifungal activities of the EO were determined against 25 standard fungal strains. These strains included C. albicans (ATCC 5982, 1912, 562, 1905, 1949, 10261, and 2730), C. tropicalis (ATCC 750), C. krusei (ATCC 6258), C. glabrata (ATCC 863, 2192, 2175, 6144, and 90030), C. dubliniensis (CBS 8501, ATCC 8500, 7987, and 7988), C. parapsilosis (ATCC 4344), C. neoformance (ATCC 9011), Aspergillus flavus (ATCC 64025), A. fumigatus (ATCC 14110, CBS 144.89), A. clavatus (CBS 514.65), and A. oryzae (CBS 818.72). Moreover, 35 clinical strains that were previously isolated from the oral or vaginal infections and identified by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism were used in this study.

Determination of minimum fungicidal concentration and minimum fungicidal concentration

The MIC of EO was determined according to broth microdilution assay as recommended by the clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI) for yeasts (M27-A3) and molds (M38-A2) (25), with some modifications. In this regard, a range of EO concentrations (0.06-16 μL/mL) was prepared in 96-well microtiter plates (Nunc) using RPMI-1640 media (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) buffered with MOPS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The inocula of the yeasts were prepared from 24-hour solid cultures, and suspensions were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard turbidity at a wavelength of 630 nm (yielding a stock suspension of 1-5×106 cells/mL). For Aspergillus species, conidia were recovered from the 7-day-old cultures grown on potato dextrose agar by a wetting loop with Tween 20. The collected conidia were transferred in sterile saline, and their turbidity was adjusted to the optical density of 0.09-0.11 yielding 0.4-5×106 conidia/mL.

The working suspension was prepared by making 1/50 and 1/1000 dilutions with the RPMI of the stock suspension for molds and yeasts, respectively. After the addition of 0.1 mL of the inocula to the wells, the trays were incubated at 30°C for 24-48 h in a humid atmosphere. In addition, 200 μL of the uninoculated medium was included as a sterility control (blank). Growth controls (medium with inoculums and 5% [v/v] without the EO) were also included.

The growth in each well was compared with that of the control well. The MICs were visually determined and defined as the lowest concentration of the EO that produced no visible growth. To this end, 10 μL of culture was taken from each well where growth was not observed on the SDA plates and then incubated at 30°C for 48 h. The minimum fungicidal concentration (MFCs) was determined as the lowest concentration yielding no more than four colonies, which corresponds to fungal mortality of 98% in the initial inoculums. Fluconazole was used as a positive control in each experiment.

Inhibition of Biofilm Formation

Serial dilution of the EO (0.015-8 μL/mL) was prepared in RPMI-1640 in 96-well microtiter plates. After the addition of 0.1 mL of the suspension of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis (5×106 cells/mL) inocula to the wells, the trays were incubated at 30°C for 24-48 h in a humid atmosphere. In addition, 200 μL of the uninoculated medium was included as a negative control (blank), while RPMI with yeasts but without EO served as a positive control. Metabolic activity was assessed using the tetrazolium salt (XTT) assay (26). Briefly, the wells coated with Candida biofilms were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Then, 0.5 mg/mL XTT (Sigma) and 10 mM menadione (Sigma) were added in 100 μL of PBS. The plates were incubated in dark for 2 h at 37°C and then gently agitated. The XTT formazan was measured colorimetrically at 490 nm.

Cytotoxicity evaluation

HeLa cell was obtained from the National Cell Bank of Iran, Pasteur Institute, Tehran, Iran. The cell line was maintained in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units ⁄ mL penicillin-G, and 100 μg ⁄ mL streptomycin. The cell was grown in monolayer culture at 37°C in humidified air containing 5% CO2. Cell viability following exposure to EO was estimated using the MTT reduction assay (27). HeLa cells were plated at the densities of 1×105 and 2.5×104 cells ⁄ mL. The control well contained no EO, and blank wells contained only growth medium for background correction. After overnight incubation at 37°C, half of the growth medium was removed, and 50 μL of the medium, supplemented with different concentrations (0.03 to 16 μL/mL) of EO dissolved in RPMI-1640, was added. The cells were incubated for 72 h. At the end of the incubation time, the medium was removed, and MTT was added to each well at a final concentration of 0.5 mg ⁄ mL. Subsequently, the plates were incubated for another 4 h at 37°C. In the next stage, formazan crystals were solubilized in 200 μL DMSO. The optical density was measured at 570 nm with background correction at 655 nm using a Bio-Rad microplate reader. Doxorubicin was used as a positive control against HeLa cells in the same setting. The percentage of viability inhibition compared to control wells was calculated for each concentration of the compound, and IC50 values were calculated using the CURVEEXPERT software, version 1.34 for Windows (Hyams Development, OH, USA).

Results

The identified chemical components of the EO obtained from the aerial parts of S. macrosiphon are presented in Table 1. A total of 26 components were identified, representing 98.70% of the total EO. The major constituents of the EO were linalool (28.46%), borneol (16.22%), and terpinene (14.58%). The antifungal activities of S. macrosiphon EO against the examined fungi are demonstrated in Table 2. The results showed that the EO inhibited the growth of all standard Candida species at concentrations of 0.25-4 μL/mL. Furthermore, the EO exhibited fungicidal activity (MFC) against the tested yeasts at a concentration range of 0.5-8 μL/mL. Moreover, the MIC and MFC values for the standard species of Aspergillus, which were sensitive to the EO, were in the range of 0.25 to 2 μL/mL and 0.5 to 4 µl/ml, respectively (Table 2).

As indicated in Table 3, the EO of S. macrosiphone showed effective antibiofilm activity against tested Candida species and inhibited the biofilm formation of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis at the concentrations of 4 and 8 μL/mL, respectively. Moreover, the cytotoxic activity of the EO in HeLa cells was evaluated and showed an IC50 value of 6.49 μL/mL.

Components RI Composition (%)
Linalool 1096 28.46
Borneol 1169 16.22
Terpinene-4-01 1177 14.58
Cis-sabinene hydrate 1070 12.96
-terpinene 1059 4.21
Camphene 945 3.22
-terpinene 1017 2.40
Caryophyllene oxide 1583 1.86
- pinene 939 1.82
-terpineol 1188 1.60
(z)-caryophyllene 1408 1.49
Bornyl acetate 1288 1.31
Geranyl acetate 1381 1.26
P-cymene 1024 1.17
Cis-p-menth-2-en-1-ol 1121 0.84
Terpinolene 1088 0.80
Sylvestrene 1030 0.77
Camphor 1146 0.69
Germacrene D 1485 0.64
-pinene 979 0.60
Bicyclogermacrene 1500 0.51
Trans-linalool oxide 1086 0.50
Sabinene 975 0.41
-thujene 930 0.39
Total 98.71
RI: retention index; Compounds listed in order of elution from a DB-5 column.
Table 1.Chemical composition of the essential oil of Satureja macrosiphon growing in Iran

Discussion

The species of genus Satureja have known aromatic EOs with medicinal properties (28). Among different species of this plant, S. macrosiphon is a rare species growing wild in Iran. In this study, the main compound of S. macrosiphone EO was determined as linalool (28.46%), while Amiri et al. reported alpha-terpineol (26.7%) as the main constituent of the EO of this species (29). Similar to our study, they found borneol as the second most frequent compound of EO (29). The difference between the chemical composition of the constituents might be due to the different genotype, geographical location, or environmental conditions of the plant materials.

Tested Candida and Aspergillus spp. isolate Number of isolate MIC (μL/mL) GM a (range) MFC (μL/mL) GM a (range)
Candida spp. Standard isolate C. albicans (6) 1.5 (1-2) 2.6 (2-4)
C. dubliniensis (5) 2.2 (1-4) 3.6 (2-4)
C. glabrata (5) 0.7 (0.5-1) 1.4 (1-2)
C. tropicalis (1) 0.5 1.0
C. parapsilosis (1) 4.0 4.0
C. krusei (1) 0.25 1.0
Candida spp. azole-sensitive clinical isolates C. albicans (9) 1.5(0.06-2) 2.7(1-4)
C. dubliniensis (3) 1.1(0.5-2) 2.3(1-4)
C. glabrata (1) 0.12 4.0
C. tropicalis (2) 1.5(1-2) 1.5(1-2)
C. parapsilosis (3) 0.5(0.25-1) 2.0
Candida spp. azole-resistant clinical isolates C. albicans (12) 1.3(0.5-4) 1.9(0.5-4)
C. dubliniensis (2) 0.25 2.0
C. tropicalis (3) 2.5(1-4) 3.0(2-4)
Aspergillus spp. standard isolate A. flavus (1 ) 2.0 4.0
A. fumigatus (2 ) 1.1 (0.25-2.0) 2.5 (1-4)
A. oryzae (1 ) 2.0 4.0
A. clavatus (1 ) 0.25 0.5
GM: geometric mean, MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration, MFC: minimum fungicidal concentration
Table 2.Antifungal activity of Satureja macrosiphon extracts against the fungal strains tested based on broth microdilution assay
Concentration µl/ml C. albicans C. dubliniensis
Optical density %Viability Optical density %Viability
8 0.045 0.0 0.047 0.0
4 0.046 0.0 0.053 2.6
2 0.048 0.24 0.127 34.7
1 0.102 6.7 0.172 54.3
0.5 0.220 20.0 0.189 61.7
0.25 0.260 25.0 0.198 65.6
0.12 0.391 41.4 0.206 69.1
0.06 0.426 45.0 0.216 70.0
0.03 0.516 56.0 0.220 75.2
0.015 0.726 81.2 0.241 83.9
Table 3.Antibiofilm activity of the essential oil of Satureja macrosiphon against biofilm formation caused by Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis

It has been shown previously that EOs exhibit their antimicrobial activity by disrupting the cell membrane of microorganisms, inhibiting their enzyme activity, and down-regulating regulatory genes (30). Previous studies demonstrated that the EOs of Satureja species are among the most potent EOs with regard to antifungal properties (31, 32). The in vitro antifungal activity of S. macrosiphone EO against the examined fungi was quantitatively determined by the CLSI method. According to the results, the EO exhibited great in vitro antifungal activities against all tested fungi at the concentration of up to 4 μL/mL. These results support the data previously reported by Gorran et al. (33), confirming the inhibitory activity of S. macrosiphone EO against the growth and mycotoxin production of A. flavus.

According to the literature, there is a relationship between the major component of the EO and its antimicrobial activity. Similar antifungal activity was also reported for the EO of S. montana, with linalool as the dominant component (34, 35). It has been reported that linaloo, as terpene alcohol, has considerable antimicrobial activity against a large number of microorganisms (36-38). Trombetta et al. showed that linaloo might protuberate the microbial plasma membrane, which in turn results in the alteration of cellular permeability and leakage of intracellular organelles and ions (30). In addition, the EO inhibited the azole-resistant strains and even exhibited fungicidal activities against all examined fungi at the concentrations of up to 4 µl/ml. No significant differences were found between azole-resistant and -susceptible clinical strains in terms of inhibitory concentration.

In recent decades, fungal biofilms have become of greater significance in the clinical context since these communities are associated with drastically enhanced ability to express resistance against most antifungal agents (39). In this regard, Candida species are the most famous fungi responsible for biofilm formation. In the present study, the formation of biofilm was inhibited completely at a concentration of up to 2 μL/mL in a dose-dependent manner. This finding is similar to that of the study performed by Manoharan et al. who reported on the strong antibiofilm activity of linalool against C. albicans (40). To the best of our knowledge, the cytotoxic activity of S. macrosiphone EO has not been reported yet. The cytotoxicity (IC50) of the EO against the HeLa cells was greater than its MICs and MFCs against the examined fungi. Therefore, this product might be used safely for pharmaceutical applications. However, it is required to perform further studies on other cell lines and carry out experimental studies on animals to accurately assess the cytotoxicity of this EO.

Conclusion

The findings of the present study were indicative of antifungal, antibiofilm, and cytotoxicity activities of S. macrosiphone against pathogenic fungi. In addition, the data provided support to use this EO in the production of antifungal agents and pharmaceutical products. As all of the tests were performed in vitro, further studies are still needed to see if a fungal infection can be treated by S. macrosiphone EO.

References

  1. Vazquez JA, Miceli MH, Alangaden G. Invasive fungal infections in transplant recipients. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2013; 1(3):85-105.
  2. Person AK, Kontoyiannis DP, Alexander BD. Fungal infections in transplant and oncology patients. Hematol Oncol Clin. 2011; 25(1):193-213.
  3. Mousset S, Buchheidt D, Heinz W, Ruhnke M, Cornely OA, Egerer G. Treatment of invasive fungal infections in cancer patients-updated recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO). Ann Hematol. 2014; 93(1):13-32.
  4. Badiee P, Hashemizadeh Z. Opportunistic invasive fungal infections: diagnosis & clinical management. Indian J Med Res. 2014; 139(2):195-204.
  5. Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. J Fungi. 2017; 3(4):E57.
  6. Caston-Osorio J, Rivero A, Torre-Cisneros J. Epidemiology of invasive fungal infection. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008; 32(Suppl 2):S103-9.
  7. Lehrnbecher T, Frank C, Engels K, Kriener S, Groll AH, Schwabe D. Trends in the postmortem epidemiology of invasive fungal infections at a university hospital. J Infect. 2010; 61(3):259-65.
  8. Jarvis WR. Epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections, with emphasis on Candida species. Clin Infect Dis. 1995; 20(6):1526-30.
  9. Perlroth J, Choi B, Spellberg B. Nosocomial fungal infections: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Med Mycol. 2007; 45(4):321-46.
  10. Jantunen E, Anttila VJ, Ruutu T. Aspergillus infections in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients: have we made any progress?. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002; 30(12):925-9.
  11. Patterson TF, Kirkpatrick WR, White M, Hiemenz JW, Wingard JR, Dupont B. Invasive aspergillosis Disease spectrum, treatment practices, and outcomes I3 Aspergillus Study Group. Medicine. 2000; 79(4):250-60.
  12. Sanglard D. Emerging threats in antifungal-resistant fungal pathogens. Front Med. 2016; 3:11.
  13. Dannaoui E, Desnos-Ollivier M, Garcia-Hermoso D, Grenouillet F, Cassaing S, Baixench M-T. Candida spp with acquired echinocandin resistance, France, 2004-2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012; 18(1):86-90.
  14. Jensen RH, Johansen HK, Arendrup MC. Stepwise development of a homozygous S80P substitution in Fks1p, conferring echinocandin resistance in Candidatropicalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57(1):614-7.
  15. Riat A, Plojoux J, Gindro K, Schrenzel J, Sanglard D. Azole resistance of environmental and clinical Aspergillusfumigatus isolates from Switzerland. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018; 62(4):e02088-17.
  16. Breda CA, Gasperini AM, Garcia VL, Monteiro KM, Bataglion GA, Eberlin MN. Phytochemical analysis and antifungal activity of extracts from leaves and fruit residues of Brazilian Savanna plants aiming its use as safe fungicides. Nat Prod Bioprospect. 2016; 6(4):195-204.
  17. El-Khateeb AY, Elsherbiny E, Tadros L, Ali S, Hamed H. Phytochemical analysis and antifungal activity of fruit leaves extracts on the mycelial growth of fungal plant pathogens. J Plant Pathol Microbiol. 2013; 4(9):1-6.
  18. Patel P, Patel N, Patel D, Desai SH, Meshram D. Phytochemical analysis and antifungal activity of Moringa oleifera. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014; 6(5):144-7.
  19. Azaz AD, Kürkcüoglu M, Satil F, Can Baser KH, Tümen G. In vitro antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of some Satureja essential oils. Flavour Fragr J. 2005; 20(6):587-91.
  20. Zeidan-Chulia F, Keskin M, Kononen E, Uitto VJ, Soderling E, Moreira JC. Antibacterial and antigelatinolytic effects of Satureja hortensis L essential oil on epithelial cells exposed to Fusobacterium nucleatum. J Med Food. 2015; 18(4):503-6.
  21. Farzaneh M, Kiani H, Sharifi R, Reisi M, Hadian J. Chemical composition and antifungal effects of three species of Satureja (S hortensis S spicigera and S khuzistanica) essential oils on the main pathogens of strawberry fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2015; 109:145-51.
  22. Bezic N, Dunkic V, Elma V. Antiphytoviral activity of essential oils of some Lamiaceae species and there most important compounds on CMV and TMV. Microbial pathogens and strategies for combating them: science, technology and education. Formatex Research Center: Spain; 2013.
  23. Bagheri S, Ahmadvand H, Khosrowbeygi A, Ghazanfari F, Jafari N, Nazem H. Antioxidant properties and inhibitory effects of Saturejakhozestanica essential oil on LDL oxidation induced–CuSO(4) in vitro. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013; 3(1):22-7.
  24. Adams RP. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. 5th ed. Mexico. Texensis Publishing; 2017.
  25. Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Melhem MS, Bonfietti LX, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. Susceptibility test for fungi: clinical and laboratorial correlations in medical mycology. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2015; 57(Suppl 19):57-64.
  26. Sabaeifard P, Abdi-Ali A, Soudi MR, Dinarvand R. Optimization of tetrazolium salt assay for Pseudomonasaeruginosa biofilm using microtiter plate method. J Microbiol Methods. 2014; 105:134-40.
  27. Riss TL, Moravec RA, Niles AL, Duellman S, Benink HA, Worzella TJ. Cell viability assays. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: Maryland; 2016.
  28. Saharkhiz MJ, Zomorodian K, Taban A, Pakshir K, Heshmati K, Rahimi MJ. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of three Satureja Species against food-borne pathogens. J Essentiol Oil Bear Plants. 2016; 19(8):1984-92.
  29. Amiri H. The in vitro antioxidative properties of the essential oils and methanol extracts of Saturejamacrosiphonia Bornm. Nat Prod Res. 2011; 25(3):232-43.
  30. Trombetta D, Castelli F, Sarpietro MG, Venuti V, Cristani M, Daniele C. Mechanisms of antibacterial action of three monoterpenes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005; 49(6):2474-8.
  31. Kundakovic T, Stanojkovic T, Kolundzija B, Markovic S, Sukilovic B, Milenkovic M. Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil from Saturejamontanasubsp pisidica (Lamiceae). Nat Prod Commun. 2014; 9(4):569-72.
  32. Bukvicki D, Stojkovic D, Sokovic M, Vannini L, Montanari C, Pejin B. Saturejahorvatii essential oil: in vitro antimicrobial and antiradical properties and in situ control of Listeriamonocytogenes in pork meat. Meat Sci. 2014; 96(3):1355-60.
  33. Gorran A, Salehnia B, Farzaneh HR, Farzaneh M, Shivazad M. Effect of essential oils and extracts of Saturejamacrosiphon and Saturejakhozistanica on mycelial growth and aflatoxin B1 production in Aspergillusflavus. J Vet Res. 2015; 70(2):139-45.
  34. Slavkovska V, Jancic R, Bojovic S, Milosavljevic S, Djokovic D. Variability of essential oils of SaturejamontanaL and Saturejakitaibeliiwierzb exHeuff from the central part of the balkan peninsula. Phytochemistry. 2001; 57(1):71-6.
  35. Kremer D, Kosir IJ, Koncic MZ, Cerenak A, Potocnik T, Srecec S. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of SaturejamontanaL and S subspicataVis (Lamiaceae). Curr Drug Targets. 2015; 16(14):1623-33.
  36. Park M, Gwak K, Yang I, Kim K, Jeung E, Chang J. Effect of citral, eugenol, nerolidol and α-terpineol on the ultrastructural changes of Trichophytonmentagrophytes. Fitoterapia. 2009; 80(5):290-6.
  37. Cha JD, Jung EK, Kil BS, Lee KY. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of essential oil from Artemisiafeddei. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007; 17(12):2061-5.
  38. Alviano W, Mendonca‐Filho R, Alviano D, Bizzo H, Souto‐Padron T, Rodrigues M. Antimicrobial activity of Crotoncajucara Benth linalool‐rich essential oil on artificial biofilms and planktonic microorganisms. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2005; 20(2):101-5.
  39. Ramage G, Rajendran R, Sherry L, Williams C. Fungal biofilm resistance. Int J Microbiol. 2012; 2012:528521.
  40. Manoharan RK, Lee JH, Kim YG, Kim SI, Lee J. Inhibitory effects of the essential oils α-longipinene and linalool on biofilm formation and hyphal growth of Candidaalbicans. Biofouling. 2017; 33(2):143-55.