Identification of Candida species in the oral cavity of diabetic patients

Authors

1 Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Medical Mycology and Parasitology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Isfahan Province Health Center, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Diabetic patients are more susceptible to oral candidiasis infection than non-diabetics due to the factors promoting oral carriage of Candida. Several factors can increase colonization of Candida species in the oral cavity such as xerostomia, which reduces the salivary flow and is a salivary pH disorder. In the current study, we aimed to identify and compare the colonization level of Candida spp. in the oral cavity of diabetic and non-diabetic groups.
Materials and Methods: Swabs were taken from the mouth of 106 participants and were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) medium. Likewise, the saliva samples were collected for salivary glucose and pH measurements. The study was performed during June 2014-September 2015 on two groups of diabetic patients (n=58) and non-diabetics (n=48) as the control group. The Candida spp. were identified with PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) using the restriction enzymes HinfI and MspI and were differentiated by culture on CHROMagar Candida medium.
Results:The frequency of Candida spp. was higher in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetics. The most frequent Candida spp. in the diabetic patients were Candida albicans (36.2%), C. krusei (10.4%), C. glabrata (5.1%), and C. tropcalis (3.4%). Likewise, C. albicans was the most frequent species (27%) in the non-diabetic individuals. In this study, the results of both methods for identification of the isolates were consistent with each other.
Conclusion: Xerostomia and disturbance of physiological factors including pH and glucose can promote overgrowth of Candida flora in the oral cavity. These factors are considered important predisposing factors for oral candidiasis in diabetic patients. In the present study, it was observed that application of CHROMagar Candida and PCR-RFLP methods at the same time contributes to more accurate identification of isolates.
 

Keywords


Introduction

In the recent decade, growth of the immunocompromised population has led to increased incidence of invasive Candida infections [1]. Oral candidiasis is a common opportunistic infection of the oral cavity caused by an overgrowth of candida species particularly Candida albicans [2]. Numerous risk factors such as age, gender, nutrition, oral hygiene, smoking, dentures, salivary pH disorder, and xerostomia (dry mouth) make diabetic patients more susceptible to oral candidiasis [3, 4].

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the most common endocrine metabolic disorder [5-7]. Approximately 85-90% of diabetic patients are diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (resulting from insulin resistance); in these patients, salivary dysfunctions such as xerostomia, decreased salivary function, lichen planus, tooth decay, and periodontal diseases are common [6, 8]. Among the reasons making diabetic patients more susceptible to oral candidiasis are high levels of salivary glucose, low secretion of saliva, impaired chemotaxis, and defect of phagocytosis due to polymorphonuclear leukocyte deficiency [9, 10]. The attachment of C. albicans to the crystalline hydroxyapatite produces collagenolytic enzyme, which increases crystal solubility and consumes nitrogen of dentin collagen in DM patients [11-15].

Due to the upsurge in the level of non-albicans Candida species as well as azole-resistant isolates, finding a reliable diagnostic method is necessary for the treatment of Candida-related infections. The CHROMagar Candida is a chromogenic culture medium for the isolation and identification of Candida species based on colony color [16, 17].

Although CHROMagar Candida culture helps with identification of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, and C. glabrata, all isolates cannot be recognized in this method. Therefore, Candida albicans and non-albicans were identified by using PCR-RFLP, which is a rapid and cost-effective molecular method [18, 19].

Herein, we aimed to determine the distribution of Candida species in the oral cavity with CHROMagar candida and PCR-(restriction fragment length polymorphism) RFLP by the restriction enzymes HinfI and MspI in order to evaluate and compared the amount of yeasts colonized in the oral cavity of diabetic with non-diabetic individuals. Our results can help with improving patient treatment outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.

Materials and Methods

Study group

The samples were collected from patients attending the diabetes clinics of Sannandaj, Iran, during June 2014-September 2015. The study groups consisted of DM patients with fasting serum glucose level of higher than 126 mg/dl and medical records of the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). A form was designed to record the medical history of patients, type of diabetes, fasting serum glucose level, and demographic data.

The study groups were age and gender matched; and the patient group consisted of 58 patients with type II diabetes mellitus (38 males [65.5%] and 20 females [34.5%]) with the mean age of 50.33±7.63 years. The control group comprised of 48 non-diabetic individuals with the mean age of 49.85±8.71 years. Predisposing factors in the healthy subjects included smoking, wearing dentures, dental caries, and oral lesions.

Ethical considerations

Patient-related data was collected in accordance with the applicable principles of research ethics committees of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, and written consent was obtained from the participants at the beginning the study.

Sample collection

Swabs were taken from the mouth of 106 subjects and were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) medium (Merck, Germany). Saliva samples were collected for salivary glucose and pH measurements, as well.

Procedure of culturing and isolating Candida species

The plates were incubated for 72 h at 25°C. Then, pure colonies were transferred on CHROMagar candida (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) for the isolation and presumptive identification of Candida species. The Candida isolates were identified after incubation for 48 h at 37°C [20]. Light green colony color reveals C. albicans, steel blue colonies C. tropicalis, large, fuzzy, and rose-colored colonies indicated C. krusei [16].

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from each sample as described before [21, 22]. A loop full of fresh colony was harvested and added to 300 µl of lysis buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH=8, 2% Triton X-100, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1 mM EDTA, pH=8). Thereafter, the solution was added to 300 μl of phenol: chloroform (1:1) and 200 μl of glass beads, with a diameter of 1 mm. After shaking, the samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 10000 rpm. Then, 400 µl of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol mixture (25:24:1) was added to the supernatant. In the next step, after centrifuging, 1 volume of cold isopropanol and 3 M of sodium acetate were added to the upper phase and were kept at -20°C for 10 min. The sample was washed by 70% ethanol and preserved at -20 °C until the using time [23].

PCR amplification

The PCR amplification of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region in ribosomal DNA was carried out by forward (5’-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3’) and reverse (5’TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’) primers [24].

Afterwards, for preparing the master mix, 2.5 μl of 10x PCR buffer, 2.5 mM of MgCl2, 0.5 μl of 10 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μl of each primer (15 pmol/µl), 1.25 units of Taq polymerase (Sinagene, Iran), 5 μl of template DNA, and molecular grade dH2O up to 30 μl were used. The temperature cycles were as follows: initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 56°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. All the amplified products were visualized by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis.

Candida species Colony color on CHROMagar Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism
C. albicans Light green(34) 34
C. tropicalis Blue(2) 2
C. parapsilopsis - -
C. dubliniensis - -
C. krusei Pink–purple(5) 5
C. glabrata Pink–purple(2) 2
C. kefyr Pink(2) 2
Table 1.Identification of Candida species by growth on CHROMagar Candida medium and molecular methods
Candida spp. Diabetic patients No.(%) Healthy subjects No.(%)
C. albicans 21(36.2%) 13(27.08%)
C. krusei 3(5.2%) 2 (4.16%)
C. glabrata 2(3.4%) -
C. krusei and C. albicans C. glabrata and C. albicans 3(5.2%) 1(1.7%) --
C. kefyr - 2(4.16%)
C. tropicalis 2(3.4%) -
Total 32(55.1%) 17(35.4%)
Table 2.Frequency of Candida species colonization in the oral cavity of the diabetic patients and controls
Variables Colony ≥ 50 Colony ≥ 50 P- value
Diabetic patients 26(45%) 32(65%) 0.044
Non-diabetic participants 31(64.5%) 17(35.4%)
Gender
   Male 34(56.6%) 28(57.1%) 0.794
   Female 23(40.4%) 21(42.9%)
Age 48.16±7.81 52.39±7.92 0.009
Salivary pH 6.88±0.36 6.44±0.41 0.001
Salivary glucose 2.25±0.44 2.78±0.54 0.001
Tooth brushing habit (day)
   0 27(47.4%) 34(69.4%)
   1 26(45.6%) 15(30.6%)
   2 4(7%) 0 (0%)
Dry mouth <0.001
   Yes 19(33.3%) 34(69.4%)
   NO 38(66.7%) 15(30.6%)
Table 3.Mean percentages of candidal load in the oral cavity and baseline characteristics of the diabetic patients compared to non-diabetics

Figure 1.Gel pictures showing the band patterns: (A) PCR products of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 in diabetic patients and non-diabetics, 1-3: C. albicans, 4: C. glabrata, 6, 8: C. krusei, 7: C. tropicalis, and 9: negative control. (B) MspI restriction fragments for the eight random diabetic samples: 1-2: C. krusei, 3-4: C. glabrata, 5-6: C. albicans, and 7-8: C. tropicalis. (C) HinfI restriction fragments on Candida spp. for the diabetic and non-diabetic isolates: 1, 4, 5: C. glabrata, 2: C. albicans, 3: C. tropicalis, 6: C. krusei, and 7: C. kefyr

Restriction enzyme digestion

Following PCR amplification, the ITSI-5.8S-ITSII PCR products were digested with HinfI and MspI restriction enzymes. Digestion was performed by incubating 10 μl of each PCR product, 1.5 μl of digestion buffer, 5 units of MSP1 and HinfI enzymes (Sinagene, Iran), and dH2o up to 15 μl at 37°C for 2 h [24]. The restriction fragments were visualized and compared by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis after treating with MSP1 and HinfI enzymes as it shown in Table 1.

Statistical analysis

To analyze the data, Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests were run, using SPSS version 15.0.

Results

From the samples of 58 diabetic patients and 48 controls, 32 (55%) and 17 (35.5%) were positive for Candida species, respectively. Table 1 exhibits identification of Candida species by growth on CHROMagar Candida medium and molecular methods. Of the 32 isolated Candida spp. in DM patients, 25 (43.1%) were identified as Candida albicans, whereas C. dubliniensis, and C. parapsilosis were not isolated from any of the study groups. In the healthy subjects group, 13 (27%) C. albicans were identified (Table 2). The current results indicated that colonization of Candida in the mouth of diabetic patients was more frequent in comparison with the non-diabetic group. In addition, C. albicans was the most prominent species isolated from the oral cavity of both groups.

The mean percentages of candidal load in the oral cavity and the baseline characteristics of the DM patients compared to non-diabetics are demonstrated in Table 3.

PCR amplification of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions

Positive cultures of samples taken from both groups revealed the following bands after performing PCR amplification: 37 isolates at 540 bp, 5 isolates at 900 bp, 2 isolates at 520 bp, 7 isolates at 510 bp, and 2 isolates at 720 bp band (Figure 1). In this study, the results of molecular method and the colony features of the isolates on CHROMagar Candida culture medium demonstrated perfect harmony.

Discussion

Poor oral hygiene in diabetic patients may increase the level of Candida spp. as part of the oral flora and might affect the superficial and systemic fungal infections compared with healthy individuals [25-27]. In oral candidiasis, biofilm formation and overgrowth of Candida species are significantly higher in diabetic patients. A combination of host and fungal risk factors such as increased salivary glucose, decreased salivary pH, salivary flow reduction, advancing age, dentures, smoking habits, irritation, and xerostomia facilitate Candida spp. colonization [28].

Recently, resistance to antifungal agents has been reported in Candida species, especially in strains isolated from immunocompromised patients [29-32]. Our objective was to compare the presence and colonization of Candida spp. in the saliva of diabetic patients and non-diabetic controls. We found higher incidence of Candida infection in diabetic patients. The increased candidal colonization in diabetic patients could be attributed to the promotion of the binding of Candida to epithelial cells and reduction of tissue resistance against infection. Likewise, salivary glucose and pH levels are correlated with the increased carriage rate of Candida in diabetic patients [33-36].

In the present study, diabetic patients aged 40-50 years old with high salivary glucose, low salivary pH, history of xerostomia, and low oral hygiene showed more than 50 colonies of Candida in their mouth. Our data revealed that 32 (55%) of diabetic patients were found to carry Candida spp. in their oral cavity, and Candida albicans was the most prominent species (43.1%) isolated from the oral cavity of the diabetic patients compared with the non-diabetic controls (27%), which was in accordance with the findings of the previous studies [28, 37, 38].

Belazi et al. isolated Candida spp. from the oral cavity of 64% of diabetic patients and 40% of non-diabetic controls. They evaluated the predisposing factors such as xerostomia, dentures, advanced age, gender, and diabetes for colonization of Candida in the oral cavity, which showed the same results as the current ones [36].

Javed et al. demonstrated high prevalence of oral C. albicans carriage associated with denture wearing in males (74%) compared to females (23%) with type 2 diabetes. Dentures may act as an additional reservoir for these organisms through the biofilm formation of Candida in the oral cavity [39].

In the present study, the reason for a higher carriage rate of Candida in DM patients was the reduction of salivary pH (6.52±0.48) compared to the control groups (6.87±0.29). Eslami et al. reported that the means of salivary pH level in diabetic patients and healthy subjects were 6.96±0.71 and 7.53±0.58, respectively, and revealed a significant difference in salivary pH between the two groups (P<0.001) [40].

Kaminishi et al. described that collagenolytic enzyme, which is produced by C. albicans, lowers human dentinal collagen and uses the dentinal structure, especially collagen, for growth. The optimal activity of the enzyme is at pH 3.5 to 4.0. Likewise, C. albicans produces lactic acid by the fermentation of carbohydrates that leads to reducing the hydroxyapatite structure of the teeth [41], which may be the reason for the low salivary pH level in diabetic patients.

Although, among the Candida species, C. albicans has the highest frequency in the oral cavity, in the last two decades, the incidence of oral candidiasis with other species such as C. glabrata and C. krusei that are less sensitive to azole compounds has increased [42]. C. dubliniensis is mostly detected in the oral cavity of patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [43, 44]. Alborzi et al. reported 13.3% C. dubliniensis from mucosal sites in HIV positive patients [45]. The differentiation between C. dubliniensis and C. albicans due to the high degree of phenotypic similarity remains a problem. This species produce a distinctive dark green color on CHROMagar Candida compared to C. albicans isolates, which are light green [46, 47]. PCR-RFLP is an ideal method for differentiation of Candida species from each other [48, 49].

In evaluation of subjects with poorly controlled and well-controlled type 2 diabetes using CHROMagar Candida, Melton et al. reported that C. dubliniensis was not found in oral samples, which were incubated at 42°C [50] . In the current study, C. dubliniensis and C. parapsilosis were not detected in oral samples by CHROMagar candida and PCR-RFLP methods.

Zahir et al. used PCR amplification and digestion by the restriction enzymes HinfI and MspI for identification of Candida species at different sites in the oral cavity. They found that the candidal loads of the saliva, tongue, palate, and buccal mucosa of denture-wearers were significantly higher than those of the control group [24].

Pinto et al. used universal primers ITS1-ITS4 for the amplification of ITS1 and ITS2 regions and they showed fragments ranging in size from 350 to 950 bp. Amplicons were digested with eight restriction enzymes [51].

RFLP-PCR using ITSI and ITS4 primers and restriction enzymes MspI and HinfI is a quick, easy, and reliable method for the identification of clinically important Candida spp.

Conclusion

The candidal load of oral mucusa in DM patients were found to be significantly higher than those of the control group. In the present study, the patients with high salivary glucose, low salivary pH, history of xerostomia, and low oral hygiene showed more than 50 colonies of Candida in their mouth. Our data revealed that 55% of diabetic patients were found to carry Candida spp. in their oral cavity, and C. albicans was the most prominent species. Consideration of the possibility of oral Candida infections in DM patients is emphasized for improving patient treatment outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.

References

  1. Garnacho-Montero J, Amaya-Villar R, Ortiz-Leyba C, León C, Álvarez-Lerma F, Nolla-Salas J. Isolation of Aspergillus spp from the respiratory tract in critically ill patients: risk factors, clinical presentation and outcome. Crit Care. 2005; 9(3):R191-9.
  2. Cannon RD, Holmes AR, Mason AB, Monk BC. Oral Candida: clearance, colonization, or candidiasis?. J Dent Res. 1995; 74(5):1152-61.
  3. Hopcraft MS, Tan C. Xerostomia: an update for clinicians. Aust Dent J. 2010; 55(3):238-44.
  4. Guggenheimer J, Moore PA. Xerostomia: etiology, recognition and treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134(1):61-9.
  5. Akpan A, Morgan R. Oral candidiasis. Postgrad Med J. 2002; 78(922):455-9.
  6. Ship JA. Diabetes and oral health: an overview. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134:4S-10.
  7. Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW. Host factors and oral candidosis. Oral Candid. 1990; 66:103.
  8. Vijan S. In the clinic: Type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152(5):ITC3-15.
  9. Zegarelli DJ. Fungal infections of the oral cavity. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1993; 26(6):1069-89.
  10. Kadir T, Pisiriciler R, Akyüz S, Yarat A, Emekli N, Ipbüker A. Mycological and cytological examination of oral candidal carriage in diabetic patients and non-diabetic control subjects: thorough analysis of local aetiologic and systemic factors. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29(5):452-7.
  11. Budtz-Jörgensen E. Etiology, pathogenesis, therapy, and prophylaxis of oral yeast infections. Acta Odontol Scand. 1990; 48(1):61-9.
  12. Rotrosen D, Calderone RA, Edwards JE Jr. Adherence of Candida species to host tissues and plastic surfaces. Rev Infect Dis. 1986; 8(1):73-85.
  13. Aly FZ, Blackwell CC, Mackenzie DA, Weir DM, Clarke BF. Factors influencing oral carriage of yeasts among individuals with diabetes mellitus. Epidemiol Infect. 1992; 109(03):507-18.
  14. Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW. The adhesion of the yeast Candida albicans to epithelial cells of human origin in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 1981; 26(10):815-20.
  15. Vernillo AT. Dental considerations for the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134:24S-33.
  16. Jabra-Rizk MA, Brenner TM, Romagnoli M, Baqui AA, Merz WG, Falkler WA Jr. Evaluation of a reformulated CHROMagar Candida. J Clin Microbiol. 2001; 39(5):2015-6.
  17. Nadeem SG, Hakim ST, Kazmi SU. Use of CHROMagar Candida for the presumptive identification of Candida species directly from clinical specimens in resource-limited settings. Libyan J Med. 2010; 5(1):2144.
  18. Mousavi SA, Khalesi E, Bonjar GS, Aghighi S, Sharifi F, Aram F. Rapid molecular diagnosis for-Candida species using PCR-RFLP. Biotechnology. 2007; 6(4):583-7.
  19. Kanbe T, Kurimoto K, Hattori H, Iwata T, Kikuchi A. Rapid identification of Candida albicans and its related species Candida stellatoidea and Candida dubliniensis by a single PCR amplification using primers specific for the repetitive sequence (RPS) of Candida albicans. J Dermatol Sci. 2005; 40(1):43-50.
  20. Beighton D, Ludford R, Clark DT, Brailsford SR, Pankhurst CL, Tinsley GF. Use of CHROMagar Candida medium for isolation of yeasts from dental samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1995; 33(11):3025-7.
  21. Glee PM, Russell PJ, Welsch JA, Pratt JC, Cutler JE. Methods for DNA extraction from Candida albicans. Anal Biochem. 1987; 164(1):207-13.
  22. Löffler J, Hebart H, Schumacher U, Reitze H, Einsele H. Comparison of different methods for extraction of DNA of fungal pathogens from cultures and blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1997; 35(12):3311-2.
  23. Metwally L, Fairley DJ, Coyle PV, Hay RJ, Hedderwick S, McCloskey B. Improving molecular detection of Candida DNA in whole blood: comparison of seven fungal DNA extraction protocols using real-time PCR. J Med Microbiol. 2008; 57(3):296-303.
  24. Zahir RA, Himratul-Aznita WH. Distribution of Candida in the oral cavity and its differentiation based on the internally transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of rDNA. Yeast. 2013; 30(1):13-23.
  25. Fisher BM, Lamey PJ, Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW, Frier BM. Carriage of Candida species in the oral cavity in diabetic patients: relationship to glycaemic control. J Oral Pathol. 1987; 16(5):282-4.
  26. Guggenheimer J, Moore PA, Rossie K, Myers D, Mongelluzzo MB, Block HM. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and oral soft tissue pathologies. II. Prevalence and characteristics of Candida and candidal lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2000; 89(5):570-6.
  27. Lalla RV, D’Ambrosio JA. Dental management considerations for the patient with diabetes mellitus. J Am Dental Assoc. 2001; 132(10):1425-32.
  28. Darwazeh AM, MacFarlane TW, McCuish A, Lamey PJ. Mixed salivary glucose levels and candidal carriage in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Oral Pathol Med. 1991; 20(6):280-3.
  29. Haddadi P, Zareifar S, Badiee P, Alborzi A, Mokhtari M, Zomorodian K. Yeast colonization and drug susceptibility pattern in the pediatric patients with neutropenia. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014; 7(9):e11858.
  30. Shokohi T, Bandalizadeh Z, Hedayati MT, Mayahi S. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from oropharyngeal lesions of patients with cancer to some antifungal agents. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2011; 4(2):S19-26.
  31. Maheronnaghsh M, Tolouei S, Dehghan P, Chadeganipour M, Yazdi M. Identification of Candida species in patients with oral lesion undergoing chemotherapy along with minimum inhibitory concentration to fluconazole. Adv Biomed Res. 2016; 5(1):132.
  32. Badiee P, Badali H, Diba K, Ghadimi Moghadam A, Hosseininasab A, Jafarian H. Susceptibility pattern of Candida albicans isolated from Iranian patients to antifungal agents. Curr Med Mycol. 2016; 2(1):24-9.
  33. Samaranayake L, Hughes A, MacFarlane T. The proteolytic potential of Candida albicans in human saliva supplemented with glucose. J Med Microbiol. 1984; 17(1):13-22.
  34. Odds FC, Evans EG, Taylor MA, Wales JK. Prevalence of pathogenic yeasts and humoral antibodies to Candida in diabetic patients. J Clin Pathol. 1978; 31(9):840-4.
  35. Knight L, Fletcher J. Growth of Candida albicans in saliva: stimulation by glucose associated with antibiotics, corticosteroids, and diabetes mellitus. J Infect Dis. 1971; 123(4):371-7.
  36. Belazi M, Velegraki A, Fleva A, Gidarakou I, Papanaum L, Baka D. Candidal overgrowth in diabetic patients: potential predisposing factors. Mycoses. 2005; 48(3):192-6.
  37. Willis AM, Coulter WA, Fulton CR, Hayes JR, Bell PM, Lamey PJ. Oral candidal carriage and infection in insulin-treated diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 1999; 16(8):675-9.
  38. Dorocka-Bobkowska B, Budtz-Jörgensen E, Włoch S. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for denture stomatitis. J Oral Pathol Med. 1996; 25(8):411-5.
  39. Javed F, Klingspor L, Sundin U, Altamash M, Klinge B, Engström PE. Periodontal conditions, oral Candida albicans and salivary proteins in type 2 diabetic subjects with emphasis on gender. BMC Oral Health. 2009; 9(1):12.
  40. Eslami H, Fakhrzadeh V, Pakdel F, Pouralibaba F, Falsafi P, Kahnamouii SS. Comparative evaluation of salivary pH levels in type II diabetic patients and healthy. J Akademik. 2011; 14:10.
  41. Kaminishi H, Hagihara Y, Hayashi S, Cho T. Isolation and characteristics of collagenolytic enzyme produced by Candida albicans. Infect Immun. 1986; 53(2):312-6.
  42. Krcmery V, Barnes AJ. Non-albicans Candida spp causing fungaemia: pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. J Hosp Infect. 2002; 50(4):243-60.
  43. de Paula SB, Bartelli TF, Di Raimo V, Santos JP, Morey AT, Bosini MA. Effect of eugenol on cell surface hydrophobicity, adhesion, and biofilm of Candida tropicalis and Candida dubliniensis isolated from oral cavity of HIV-infected patients. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014; 2014:505204.
  44. Deorukhkar SC, Saini S, Mathew S. Non-albicans Candida infection: an emerging threat. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2014; 2014:615958.
  45. Badiee P, Alborzi A, Davarpanah MA, Shakiba E. Distributions and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species from mucosal sites in HIV positive patients. Arch Iran Med. 2010; 13(4):282-7.
  46. Gutierrez J, Morales P, Gonzalez MA, Quindos G. Candida dubliniensis, a new fungal pathogen. J Basic Microbiol. 2002; 42(3):207-27.
  47. Deorukhkar SC, Saini S. Laboratory approach for diagnosis of candidiasis through ages. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2014; 3(1):206-18.
  48. Shokohi T, Hashemi Soteh MB, Saltanat Pouri Z, Hedayati MT, Mayahi S. Identification of Candida species using PCR-RFLP in cancer patients in Iran. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2010; 28(2):147-51.
  49. Pakshir K, Zakaei A, Motamedi M, Rahimi Ghiasi M, Karamitalab M. Molecular identification and in-vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida species isolated from patients with onychomycosis. Curr Med Mycol. 2015; 1(4):26-32.
  50. Melton JJ, Redding SW, Kirkpatrick WR, Reasner CA, Ocampo GL, Venkatesh A. Recovery of Candida dubliniensis and other Candida species from the oral cavity of subjects with periodontitis who had well-controlled and poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a pilot study. Spec Care Dentist. 2010; 30(6):230-4.
  51. Pinto PM, Resende MA, Koga-Ito CY, Ferreira JA, Tendler M. rDNA-RFLP identification of Candida species in immunocompromised and seriously diseased patients. Can J Microbiol. 2004; 50(7):514-20.