Evaluation of biofilm formation in the homozygous and heterozygous strains of vaginal Candida albicans isolates

Authors

1 Department of Parasitology and Mycology, Basic Sciences in Infectious Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

2 Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

3 3- Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Candida albicans is one of the most opportunistic yeasts around the world. This species has two heterozygous and homozygous strains at hyphal wall protein 1 (hwp1) gene locus. A simple method for the discrimination of these two strains is the amplification of HWP1 gene. Regarding this, the aim of this study was to discriminate C. albicans heterozygous and homozygous strains via the amplification of hwp1 gene and evaluation of biofilm formation between the strains.
Materials and Methods: A total of 60 homozygous (n=30) and heterozygous (n=30) strains were discriminated among 126 C. albicans vaginal isolates by the amplification of HWP1 gene, using specific primers. The evaluation of biofilm formation was accomplished using the visual method.
Results: According to the results, the homozygous and heterozygous strains produced one and two DNA fragments, respectively. The frequency of homozygous strains among the C. albicans vaginal isolates was 76.2%. Biofilm formation activity in the heterozygous strains was more than that in the homozygous strains. However, statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the strains in terms of biofilm formation.
Conclusion: As the findings indicated, the frequency of the heterozygous strains in C. albicans was lower than that of the homozygous strains. Both of the strains could form biofilm in the different ranges of severity. High activity of biofilm formation in heterozygous strains may set the ground for its pathogenicity.
 

Keywords


Introduction

Candida albicans is the most pathogenic Candida species causing candidiasis in the world. Hyphal wall protein 1 (HWP1) is a gene causing virulence in systemic candidiasis [1]. The HWP1 also encodes an adhesion receptor which plays a role in adhesion and biofilm formation by cross-linking to the glucans of C. albicans cell wall [2]. The genetic characteristics of C. albicans as a diploid fungal pathogen has been studied by many researchers [3, 4].

Candida albicans has two homozygous and heterozygous strains at the HWP1 locus. Accordingly, one of the methods for the identification of these strains is the amplification of this gene [5]. In this regard, during the amplification of this locus, the production of one DNA fragment at 941 base pair (bp) reveals homozygous strains, while the production of two fragments at 941 and 839 bp is indicative of the heterozygous strains of C. albicans [5-7].

Candida albicans has different virulence factors. Secretion of exoenzymes and biofilm production have an important role in the virulence of C. albicans [8]. Biofilm formation is thought to be one of the Candida’s most important growth adaptations and could serve as a reservoir for disseminated infections [9].

Candida vaginitis is one of the most common forms of candidiasis in women. In general, 85-90% of the vaginal isolates obtained from patients with Candida vaginitis is C. albicans [5, 10]. Candida vaginitis is the result of the superficial penetration of Candida species into the mucosal lining of the vagina and induction of an inflammatory response. The degree of irritation and severity in symptoms is typically different in patients [10]. Adhesion to the surface of the mucosa is the first step for Candida invasion.

A combination of homozygous and heterozygous strains of C. albicans almost exists in the vaginal area. The identification of the differences in the severity of adhesion between these strains as a risk factor could be responsible for the severity of symptoms among the patients. With this background in mind, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the prevalence of homozygous and heterozygous strains in vaginal C. albicans isolates by the amplification of HWP1 gene and implementation of a comparative analysis of biofilm as a virulence factor among the isolates.

Materials and Methods

The research project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Departmental Review Board (Ethical code: IR.SUMS.REC.1397.380) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Candida albicans isolates

A total of 30 homozygous and 30 heterozygous strains of vaginal C. albicans isolates were estimated for the evaluation of biofilm formation. Given the lack of any distinct data about the frequency of homozygote and heterozygote in C. albicans, a total of 126 stock samples of vaginal C. albicans species previously isolated from patients suffering vaginal candidiasis were examined in the current study.

All the isolates had been previously identified as C. albicans through conventional (e.g., germ tube test, colony color on chromogenic media, and chlamydoconidia test) and molecular (e.g., polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism using restriction enzymes) methods and kept at -20℃ as stocks. The isolates were subcultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (Merck, Germany) before being used.

Molecular method for discrimination

Homozygous and heterozygous strains were discriminated by the amplification of HWP1 gene.

DNA isolation and polymerase chain reaction

Genomic DNA was extracted by the boiling method as described by Makimura et al. [11].

To this end, some yeast colonies were added to a lysis buffer containing 30 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 0.5% sodium dodecylsulphate, and 100 mM Tris-HCl, and then boiled for 15 min. In the next stage, potassium acetate solution (2.5 M) was added and held on ice for 1 h, followed by centrifugation at 16,128 g for 5 min. Afterward, the DNA in the supernatant was precipitated with isopropanol, washed twice with ethanol, and dried in the air.

Finally, 50 𝜇l of distilled water was added prior to use for PCR. The amplification of HWP1 gene was accomplished using two primers (i.e., CR-f 5'-GCTACCACTTCAGAATCATCATC-3' and CR-r 5'-GCACCTTCAGTCGTAGAGACG-3') and Ampliqon master mix kit (Amplicon, Denmark). The PCR reaction conditions for 35 cycles included initial denaturation for 5 min at 94℃, denaturation step for 30 sec at 94℃, annealing for 45 sec at 62℃, and extension for 45 sec at 72℃, followed by a final extension for 7 min at 72℃.

The PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis in a 1.2% (wt/vol) agarose and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide (0.5 𝜇g/ml). In this regard, the production of one DNA fragment at 941 base pare (bp) reveals homozygous strains, while the formation of two fragments at 941 and 839 bp is indicative of the heterozygous strains of C. albicans.

Biofilm formation detection

Biofilm formation was assessed by a visual detection method [12]. To this end, a loopful of the colonies was added to a 10-mL Falcon tube, containing Sabouraud dextrose broth supplemented with glucose (at a final concentration of 8%), and then incubated at 35℃ for 48 h.

The broth in the tubes was gently aspirated, and the tubes were washed with distilled water twice, and then stained with safranin 1%, which was decanted after 10 min. In the next step, the tubes were examined for the presence of visible adherent films at the bottom and wall of the tubes. The test was conducted in duplicate, and the results were expressed as negative (–), weak (+), moderate (++), and strong (+++). In addition, Staphylococcus epidermidis (PTCC 1435) and C. albicans (ATCC10261) were used as positive controls.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using the Fisher’s exact test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results and discussion

According to the results, HWP1 gene was perfectly amplified in all 126 isolates of C. albicans. In addition, 30 homozygous strains and 30 heterozygous strains were discriminated according to the number of DNA fragments (Figure 1). The homozygous and heterozygous strains had the frequencies of 76.2% and 23.8% among the examined C. albicans species, respectively. Biofilm formation was detected in 93% of the homozygous strains, where 30% of the strains expressed 3+ activities (Figure 2). Furthermore, 2 homozygous strains were biofilm-negative, and 9 strains had a strong biofilm formation (3+).

In addition, with regard to the heterozygous strains, all of the strains had biofilm formation, and 50% of the strains presented 3+ activities (Figure 2). More details are available in Table 1. Despite the variety in the results obtained for the two strains, the statistical analysis of biofilm formation demonstrated no significant difference between the two strains (P=0.21).

Candida albicans is one of the most common causes of Candida infections. The other two yeast species that are closely related to C. albicans are Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana, named as C. albicans species complex [5, 13]. One of the best methods for the discrimination of these species is the production of DNA fragments in different sizes through the amplification of HWP1 gene [14, 15]. The amplification of HWP1 gene locus could also facilitate the discrimination of homozygous and heterozygous strains of C. albicans by producing one or two DNA fragment size after the emergence of the bands in agarose gel [6].

Figure 1.Amplification of HWP1 gene producing one fragment (941 bp) for homozygous strain (lanes 2-4) and two fragments (941 and 839 bp) for heterozygous strains (lanes 6-9); molecular size markers (lanes 1, 10)

Figure 2.Biofilm formation test [From left to right: Negative control (c), the second (grade 1+), the third (grade 2+), and the fourth (grade 3+)]

Strains Virulence factors Total
Biofilm formation
0 - 1+ 2+ 3+
Homozygous 2 10 9 9 30
Heterozygous 0 6 9 15 30
Table 1.Comparison of virulence factors and biofilm formation between the heterozygous and homozygous strains of vaginal Candida albicans

There are many studies regarding the role of HWP1 gene in Candida pathogenesis as a risk factor. Tsuchimori et al. [16] investigated the role of this gene as a virulence factor and reported a reduction in virulence during exposing a homozygous HWP1 null mutant of C. albicans in infected mice. Furthermore, Hosseini et al. [17] highlighted the importance of HWP1 gene in coding a cell surface protein, suggesting that biofilm formation is responsible for adherence. Orsi et al. [18] also stated that HWP1 affects the pathogenic morphological structure of the homozygous and heterozygous genotypes of C. albicans and plays a role in yeast adhesion to the epithelial cells.

Candida vaginitis, as one of the most common Candida infections in women, is caused by many species of Candida, especially C. albicans. Secretion of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes, biofilm formation, phenotypic switching, adherence to host tissue, and many other factors have been listed as virulence factors. In addition, the aforementioned factors are reported to be involved in the pathogenicity of Candida species [19, 20]. Aspartyl proteinase contributes to tissue damage during vaginal candidiasis infection, while the other enzymes induce different tissue damages [21]. However, adherence to the cell surfaces and biofilm production are the first steps for tissue invasion, followed by inflammation as a clinical manifestation.

To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies investigating exoenzymes as virulence factors in these strains. The results of the current study indicated that the homozygous strains (75%) had a much higher frequency in the vaginal samples than the heterozygous strains. However, both strains were responsible for vaginal candidiasis. Any differences in virulence factors between these two strains could be responsible for the severity of symptoms in patients with vaginal candidiasis.

Our results revealed that both strains had the ability to produce biofilms in a different range of severity. The ability to form biofilm is an important factor in the pathogenesis of C. albicans. Based on our data, biofilm activity was lower in the homozygous strains than in the other strain. In this regard, more than 50% of the heterozygous strains could form biofilms at a high level, while only 6.7% of the homozygous strains were biofilm-negative. The statistical analysis showed no correlation between the two strains in terms of biofilm formation. However, it is hypothesized that the enhancement of the sample size may convert the results into statistically significant ones.

Conclusion

Based on the findings, the homozygous strains of C. albicans species isolated from vaginal candidiasis had a higher frequency as compared to the heterozygous strains. The comparative analysis of biofilm formation demonstrated that most of the strains could produce biofilm in different ranges of adherence. The severity of symptoms in vaginal candidiasis patients could be related to the types of strains. Nonetheless, in this sample size, our data analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the two strains in terms of the severity of biofilm formation.

References

  1. Staab JF, Bradway SD, Fidel PL, Sundstrom P. Adhesive and mammalian transglutaminase substrate properties of Candida albicans Hwp1. Science. 1999; 283(5407):1535-8.
  2. Padovan AC, Chaves GM, Colombo AL, Briones MR. A novel allele of HWP1, isolated from a clinical strain of Candida albicans with defective hyphal growth and biofilm formation, has deletions of Gln/Pro and Ser/Thr repeats involved in cellular adhesion. Med Mycol. 2009; 47(8):824-35.
  3. Noble SM, Johnson AD. Genetics of Candida albicans, a diploid human fungal pathogen. Annu Rev Genet. 2007; 41:193-211.
  4. Berman J, Sudbery PE. Candida albicans: a molecular revolution built on lessons from budding yeast. Nat Rev Genet. 2002; 3(12):918-30.
  5. Shan Y, Fan S, Liu X, Li J. Prevalence of Candida albicans-closely related yeasts, Candida africana and Candida dubliniensis, in vulvovaginal candidiasis. Med Mycol. 2014; 52(6):636-40.
  6. Mucci MJ, Cuestas ML, Landanburu MF, Mujica MT. Prevalence of Candida albicans, Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana in pregnant women suffering from vulvovaginal candidiasis in Argentina. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2017; 34(2):72-6.
  7. Köhler JR, Fink GR. Candida albicans strains heterozygous and homozygous for mutations in mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling components have defects in hyphal development. Proc Natil Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93(23):13223-8.
  8. Deorukhkar SC, Saini S, Mathew S. Virulence factors contributing to pathogenicity of Candida tropicalis and its antifungal susceptibility profile. Int J Microbiol. 2014; 2014:456878.
  9. Yigit N, Aktas E, Dagistan S, Ayyildiz A. Investigating biofilm production, coagulase and hemolytic activity in Candida species isolated from denture stomatitis patients. Eurasian J Med. 2011; 43(1):27-32.
  10. Sobel JD. Pathogenesis and treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis. 1992; 14(Suppl 1):S148-53.
  11. Makimura K, Murayama SY, Yamaguchi H. Detection of a wide range of medically important fungi by the polymerase chain reaction. J Med Microbiol. 1994; 40(5):358-64.
  12. Şeker E, Özenç E. In vitro biofilm activity of Candida species isolated from Anatolian buffaloes with mastitis in Western Turkey. Vet Arh. 2011; 81(6):723-30.
  13. Romeo O, Criseo G. Molecular epidemiology of Candida albicans and its closely related yeasts Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47(1):212-4.
  14. Pakshir K, Bordbar M, Zomorodian K, Nouraei H, Khodadadi H. Evaluation of CAMP-like effect, biofilm formation, and discrimination of Candida africana from vaginal Candida albicans species. J Pathog.. 2017; 2017:7126258.
  15. Gumral R, Sancak B, Guzel AB, Saraçlı MA, Ilkit M. Lack of Candida africana and Candida dubliniensis in vaginal Candida albicans isolates in Turkey using HWP1 gene polymorphisms. Mycopathologia. 2011; 172(1):73-6.
  16. Tsuchimori N, Sharkey LL, Fonzi WA, French SW, Edwards JE Jr, Filler SG. Reduced virulence of HWP1-deficient mutants of Candida albicans and their interactions with host cells. Infect Immun. 2000; 68(4):1997-2002.
  17. Hosseini PM, Roudbar MS, Roudbary M, Bakhshi B, Farhadi Z. Hwp1 gene expression of Candida albicans and study its role in adherence. Int J Mol Clin Microbiol. 2013; 3(2):320-4.
  18. Orsi CF, Borghi E, Colombari B, Neglia RG, Quaglino D, Ardizzoni A. Impact of Candida albicans hyphal wall protein 1 (HWP1) genotype on biofilm production and fungal susceptibility to microglial cells. Microb Pathog.. 2014; 69-70:20-7.
  19. Dabiri S, Shams-Ghahfarokhi M, Razzaghi-Abyaneh M. Comparative analysis of proteinase, phospholipase, hydrophobicity and biofilm forming ability in Candida species isolated from clinical specimens. J Mycol Med. 2018; 28(3):437-42.
  20. Jafari M, Salari S, Pakshir K, Zomorodian K. Exoenzyme activity and possibility identification of Candida dubliniensis among Candida albicans species isolated from vaginal candidiasis. Microb Pathog. 2017; 110:73-7.
  21. Schaller M, Bein M, Korting HC, Baur S, Hamm G, Monod M. The secreted aspartyl proteinases Sap1 and Sap2 cause tissue damage in an in vitro model of vaginal candidiasis based on reconstituted human vaginal epithelium. Infect Immun. 2003; 71(6):3227-34.