High prevalence of itraconazole resistance among Candida parapsilosis isolated from Iran

Document Type: Short Communication

Authors

1 Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

2 Invasive Fungi Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

3 Department of Medical Mycology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

4 Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

5 Faculty of Medicine, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

6 Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Candida parapsilosis isolates usually have a low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against azoles. Although Candida parapsilosis isolates usually have low MICs against azoles, recent studies candida invasive infections due to azole resistant-C. parapsilosis isolates . Regarding this, the main aim of this study was to determine the susceptibility pattern of Iranian clinical C. parapsilosis against available azole antifungal drugs.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 105 previously-identified isolates of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto. For the purpose of the study, the isolates were subjected to antifungal susceptibility testing against fluconazole (FLZ), itraconazole (ITZ), voriconazole (VRZ), and two new azole drugs, namely luliconazole (LUZU) and lanoconazole (LZN). The broth microdilution reference method adopted in this study was according to the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A3 and M27-S4 documents.
Results: According to the results, 89% (n=94) of C. parapsilosis isolates showed a MIC of ≥ 1 μg/ml, indicating resistance against ITZ. Multi-azole resistance was observed in 3.8% of the isolates. In addition, LUZU and LZN demonstrated the highest efficacy with the MIC50 values of 0.5 and 1 μg/ml, respectively.
Conclusion: The majority of the isolates showed high MIC values against ITZ. This may have been associated with the long-term ITZ prophylaxis/therapy in patients infected with candidiasis. Hence, the adoption of an appropriate antifungal agent is a crucial step for starting the treatment.
Background and Purpose: Although Candida parapsilosis isolates have usually low MICs against azoles but recent study confirmed Candida –related invasive infections due to azoles resistance C. parapsilosis isolates. The main aim of this study was to determine the susceptibility pattern of Iranian clinical C. parapsilosis against available azolesantifungal drugs. .
Material and Methods: One hundred and five previously-identified isolates of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto were subjected to antifungal susceptibility testing against fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and two new azole drugs, loliconazole and lanoconazole using the broth microdilution reference method according to CLSI M27-A3 and M27-S4 document.
Results: Eighty nine percent (n=94) of C. parapsilosis isolates showed MIC ≥ 1µg/ml which indicated resistance against itraconazole. Multi-azoles resistances were observed in 3.8% of the isolates. Loliconazole and lanoconazole demonstrated the highest efficacy with MIC50 values of 0.5 and 1µg/ml, respectively.
Conclusion: The majority of the isolates showed high MIC values against Itraconazole. It may associated with the long term Itraconazole prophylaxis/therapy in patients Infected with candidasis. Hence, choosing the appropriate antifungal is the crucial step for starting treatment.

Keywords


Introduction

Incidence of invasive fungal infections due to non-albicans Candida species has increased, especially in immunocompromised or hospitalized patients with serious underlying diseases. The most common Candida species isolated from blood samples are C. albicans (42.1%), C. glabrata (26.7%), and C. parapsilosis, respectively [1-3]. An epidemiological study on 3,648 patients in North America showed that the proportion of candidemia caused by non-albicans Candida species (57.9%) was higher than that caused by C. albicans (42.1%). Similarly, C. parapsilosis has been recognized as the third common cause (34.4%) of candidemia in Iran [4].

Candia parapsilosis is a normal human commensal agent that can also live freely in environmental niches and transmit horizontally via the hands of healthcare workers and medical devices [5]. In neonates, C. parapsilosis is recognized as the most frequent non-albicans Candida species that causes invasive candidiasis [6, 7]. Among antifungal drugs, azoles and amphotericin B have been used as the main choice for the treatment of invasive candidiasis. However, new antifungal agents, such as echinocandins, have been applied as an alternative therapy in neonates [8, 9]. Candida parapsilosis isolates are usually reported to be susceptible to azoles. Nonetheless, the results of a recent study were indicative of the incidence of invasive Candida infections as a result of azoles-resistant C. parapsilosis isolates [10, 11].

Itraconazole (ITZ), a triazole antifungal agent, is a water-soluble orally active compound with a wide spectrum of antifungal activities. Recently, this agent has been used for the prophylaxis of opportunistic fungal infections, especially in patients at the risk of candidiasis, such as patients with chronic recurrent vaginal candidiasis, chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis, and AIDS, as well as those receiving immunosuppressant drugs [12]. New representatives of this class of antifungal agents (e.g., voriconazole [VRZ], posaconazole [POS], luliconazole [LUZU], and lanoconazole [LZN]) are extensively active against Candida species [5, 13, 14].

In the present study, a large number of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates were subjected to antifungal susceptibility testing against several azole antifungals, such as fluconazole (FLZ), ITZ, VRZ, LZN, and LUZU. The aim of this study was to evaluate the susceptibility pattern of a large number of C. parapsilosis isolates against a comprehensive collection of available azoles. This study also involved the examination of the susceptibility pattern of C. parapsilosis isolates against two new antifungals, namely LUZU and LZN.

Materials and Methods

Strains and Antifungal agents

This study was conducted on a total of 105 C. parapsilosis sensu stricto strains. These species had been isolated from the different body parts of the patients infected with various clinical forms of candidiasis during 2014-2017 (Figure 1). These parts included the nails (74), hands (6), skin (2), vagina (2), urine (1), interdigital space (6), sputum (2), ear (2), and other cutaneous parts [10]. All the studied isolates were C. parapsilosis sensu stricto which had been previously screened by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the secondary alcohol dehydrogenase-encoding gene (SADH), followed by digestion with the restriction enzyme BanI. In the mentioned investigation, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019, C. orthopsilosis ATCC 96139, and C. metapsilosis ATCC 96144 were used as controls. 

Stock cultures in this study were maintained in the reference culture collection of the Invasive Fungi Research Center (IFRC, Sari, Iran). They were cultured on the 2% malt extract agar (MEA, Difco, USA) and incubated at 24°C for 2 days. The antifungal drugs (i.e., FLZ, ITZ, VRZ, LCZ, and LUZU) were in form of standard powders by their manufactures (Pfizer, Central Research, Sandwich, Kent, and the UK, respectively). The FLZ and ITZ/VRZ were resolved in sterile distilled water and dimethyl sulfide, respectively. Stoke solution of each drug was stored at -80°C.

Antifungal susceptibility testing

Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards (CLSI), M27-A3 and M27-S4 (4th edition) [15]. The antifungal agents were diluted in a standard RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma Chemical Co.), and then buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 3-(N-Morpholino) propanesulfonic acid (MOPS, sigma chemical Co.) with l-glutamine without bicarbonate to yield two times their concentration. Subsequently, they were distributed into 96-well microdilution trays (Nunc, UK) with a final concentration of 0.016-16 µg/ml for ITZ, VRZ, LCZ, and LUZU. Regarding FLZ, this concentration was considered as 0.063-64µg/ml.

Conidial suspensions were prepared from the isolates grown for 24 h. They were then suspended in a sterile saline solution and adjusted by spectrophotometric measurements at 530 nm wavelengths to a percent transmittance range of 75-77. A working suspension was made by a 1:10 dilution, followed by a 1:100 dilution of the stock suspension with RPMI 1640 medium, which resulted in 2.5-5×103 CFU/ml. A 100-μl volume of yeast inoculum and an equal volume of antifungal agents were added to each well. Drug-free and yeast-free wells were included as positive and negative controls, respectively. The MICs were reported as the lowest drug concentration that inhibits 50% of the growth, compared to positive controls.

Figure 1.Major origins of itraconazole-resistant isolates

The microdilution plates were incubated at 35°C and examined visually after 24 h. Candida krusei (ATCC6258) and C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) were used as quality controls. Based on the interpretative guidelines, the MIC values of ≤ 2, ≤ 4, and ≥ 8µg/ml were the breakpoints for: susceptible, susceptible dose-dependent (SDD), and resistant FLZ, respectively. Regarding ITZ and VRZS, these values were considered as ≤ 0.12, 0.25-0.5, and ≥ 1 µg/ml, for the aforementioned features, respectively. However, no breakpoints have been reported for LUZU and LNZ yet.

Results and discussion

Different origins of isolates are indicated in Figure 1. Table 1 summarizes the obtained results for antifungal susceptibility testing of all 105 C. parapsilosis isolates. The majority of the isolates showed high MIC values against ITZ. As the results indicated, 89% (n=94) of C. parapsilosis isolates showed a MIC of ≥ 1 µg/ml that were ITZ-resistant according to the CLSI guideline. Sixty-seven C. parapsilosis isolates that were resistant to ITZ were isolated from the nails obtained from Esfahan (n=45), Mazandaran (n=25), and Tehran (n=24). The most active antifungal agent against C. parapsilosis isolates was VRZ, followed by LULZ, LCZ, and FLZ.

The ITZ is mainly used for the treatment of mucosal and nosocomial infections of children [16]. Clinical studies have shown that ITZ is equally efficient for the treatment of vaginal and oropharyngeal candidiasis as well [17, 18]. The growing prevalence of C. parapsilosis isolated from blood in neonates is associated with different environmental sources [19, 20]. Presently, the azole class of antifungals has significant advantages rendering a broad spectrum of antifungal activity and fewer side effects [21]. The widespread use of FLZ for prophylaxis, as well as empirical therapy, has been interpreted as the cause of a shift in the epidemiology of Candida infections. This has led to the use of other azoles for the therapy of systemic Candida infections [22].

Recent studies have shown that ITZ could be a useful alternative for FLZ resistance Candida species [22]. Most of the clinical C. parapsilosis isolates are susceptible to azoles; however, some studies have reported an increase in the incidence of invasive infections due to azole-resistance isolates [23, 24].

In this study, reduced susceptibility to ITZ was notable. Previous studies indicated that ITZ is highly active against C. parapsilosis. In this regard, in a study, only 3 out of 120 C. parapsilosis isolates showed a MIC value of ≥ 1µg/ml (2.5%) against ITZ [25]. In an investigation performed on 124 medical centers worldwide, Pfaller et al. found no evidence of increasing azole resistance among C. parapsilosis isolates [26]. However, high MICs against ITZ (62%) were reported for Iranian Candida species isolated from the vagina [27].

In the present study, out of 105 C. parapsilosis isolates, 94 (89.5%) strains showed a MIC of ≥ 1µg/ml against ITZ. These results clearly indicate the high prevalence of ITZ resistance in Iranian C. parapsilosis isolates. The major origin of resistant isolates was the nail which could have been caused by the non-penetration of drugs into the nail plate [17]. It is also possible that the nail plate provides a better environment for higher biofilm formation rate. On the other hand, in recent years, ITZ has been used as an alternative drug against FLZ-resistant Candida isolates. Hence, long-term prophylaxis in high-risk patients can be caused by reduced ITZ susceptibility [28].

In conclusion, the high rate of resistance against ITZ, which is extensively used in Iran, seems to be an issue. In addition to echinocandins, awareness of the fact that C. parapsilosis is likely to have high MICs against ITZ seems to be a considerable issue to be addressed. It is suggested that the susceptibility pattern for isolates collected from deep candidiasis be evaluated in future studies. Moreover, further research needs to be carried out on the mechanisms of resistance.

Antifungal agents MIC (µg/ml) MIC range MIC50 MIC90 GM Mode
≥64 32 16 8 4 2 1 0.5 0.25 0.125 0.063 0.031 0.016
FLZ 3 - - 1 1 19 35 32 12 2 - - - 0.125-64 1 2 0.6546 1
ITZ 1 - - 7 31 35 20 3 5 3 - - - 0.125-64 2 4 2.4642 2
VRZ 3 - - - - - 1 1 1 2 2 18 77 0.016-64 0.016 0.031 0.01853 0.016
LZN - - - - 8 5 13 30 22 19 6 2 - 0.063-4 0.5 2 0.35355 0.5
LUZU - - - - 20 9 26 18 12 12 8 - - 0.063-4 1 4 1.04779 1
MIC range, geometric mean, MIC50, and MIC90 values are expressed in µg/ml; Numbers in boldfaces indicate the high MIC values; GM geometric mean MIC, MIC50 concentration at which 50 % of the isolates were inhibited, MIC90 concentration at which 90 % of the isolates were inhibit
Table 1.In vitro antifungal susceptibility profile of 105 clinical Candida parapsilosis isolates from Iran against eight antifungal agents

References

  1. Messer SA, Jones RN, Fritsche TR. International surveillance of Candida spp and Aspergillus spp: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2003). J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(5):1782-7.
  2. Oberoi JK. Invasive candidasis. JIMSA. 2010; 23(1):25-8.
  3. Pfaller M, Neofytos D, Diekema D, Azie N, Meier-Kriesche H-U, Quan SP. Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 3648 patients: data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH Alliance®) registry, 2004–2008. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012; 74(4):323-31.
  4. Lotfi N, Shokohi T, Nouranibaladezaei SZ, Omran AN, Kondori N. High recovery rate of non-albicans Candida species isolated from burn patients with candidemia in Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015; 8(10):e22929.
  5. Kołaczkowska A, Kołaczkowski M. Drug resistance mechanisms and their regulation in non-albicans Candida species. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016; 71(6):1438-50.
  6. Garzillo C, Bagattini M, Bogdanović L, Di Popolo A, Iula VD, Catania MR. Risk factors for Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infection in a neonatal intensive care unit: a case-control study. Ital J Pediatr. 2017; 43(1):10.
  7. Lan YB, Huang YZ, Qu F, Li JQ, Ma LJ, Yan J, Zhou JH. Time course of global gene expression alterations in Candida albicans during infection of HeLa cells. Bosnian J Basic Med Sci. 2017; 17(2):120-31.
  8. Badiee P, Badali H, Boekhout T, Diba K, Moghadam AG, Nasab AH. Antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida species isolated from the immunocompromised patients admitted to ten university hospitals in Iran: comparison of colonizing and infecting isolates. BMC Infect Dis. 2017; 17(1):727.
  9. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin DK Jr, Calandra TF, Edwards JE Jr. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48(5):503-35.
  10. Souza ACR, Fuchs BB, Pinhati HM, Siqueira RA, Hagen F, Meis JF. Candida parapsilosis resistance to fluconazole: molecular mechanisms and in vivo impact in infected Galleria mellonella larvae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015; 59(10):6581-7.
  11. Moudgal V, Little T, Boikov D, Vazquez JA. Multiechinocandin-and multiazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis isolates serially obtained during therapy for prosthetic valve endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005; 49(2):767-9.
  12. Grant SM, Clissold SP. Itraconazole A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in superficial and systemic mycoses. Drugs. 1989; 37(3):310-44.
  13. Hedayati MT, Tavakoli M, Zakavi F, Shokohi T, Mofarrah R, Ansari S. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Candida speciesisolated from diabetic patients. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2018; 51(4):542-5.
  14. Abastabar M, Al-Hatmi AM, Moghaddam MV, de Hoog GS, Haghani I, Aghili SR. Potent activity of luliconazole, lanoconazole and eight comparators against molecularly characterized fusarium species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018; 62(5):e00009-18.
  15. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Progress in antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp using clinical and laboratory standards institute broth microdilution methods, 2010-2012. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50(9):2846-56.
  16. Hiranandani M, Singhi S, Kaur I, Chakrabarti A. Disseminated nosocomial candidiasis in a pediatric intensive care unit. Indian Pediatr. 1995; 32(11):1160-6.
  17. Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Lorenzi S, Iorizzo M. Treatment of nondermatophyte mold and Candida onychomycosis. Dermatol Clin. 2003; 21(3):491-7.
  18. Gupta AK, Shear NH. A risk-benefit assessment of the newer oral antifungal agents used to treat onychomycosis. Drug Saf. 2000; 22(1):33-52.
  19. Clark TA, Slavinski SA, Morgan J, Lott T, Arthington-Skaggs BA, Brandt ME. Epidemiologic and molecular characterization of an outbreak of Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infections in a community hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42(10):4468-72.
  20. Ruiz L, Khouri S, Hahn RC, da Silva EG, de Oliveira VKP, Gandra RF. Candidemia by species of the Candida parapsilosis complex in children’s hospital: prevalence, biofilm production and antifungal susceptibility. Mycopathologia. 2013; 175(3-4):231-9.
  21. Sojakova M, Liptajova D, Borovsky M, Subik J. Fluconazole and itraconazole susceptibility of vaginal yeast isolates from Slovakia. Mycopathologia. 2004; 157(2):163-9.
  22. Mondal RK, Singhi SC, Chakrabarti A, Jayashree M. Randomized comparison between fluconazole and itraconazole for the treatment of candidemia in a pediatric intensive care unit: a preliminary study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004; 5(6):561-5.
  23. Cantón E, Pemán J, Quindós G, Eraso E, Miranda-Zapico I, Álvarez M. Epidemiology, molecular identification and antifungal susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis isolated from patients with candidemia: prospective multicenter study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011; 55(12):5590-6.
  24. Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Woosley LN, Jones RN, Castanheira M. Echinocandin and triazole antifungal susceptibility profiles of opportunistic yeast and mould clinical isolates (2010-2011): application of new CLSI clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cutoff values to characterize geographic and temporal trends of antifungal resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 2013; 51(8):2571-81.
  25. Lotfali E, Kordbacheh P, Mirhendi H, Zaini F, Ghajari A, Mohammadi R. Antifungal susceptibility analysis of clinical isolates of Candida parapsilosis in Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2016; 45(3):322-8.
  26. Castanheira M, Deshpande LM, Davis AP, Rhomberg PR, Pfaller MA. Monitoring antifungal resistance in a global collection of invasive yeasts and moulds: application of CLSI epidemiological cutoff values and whole genome sequencing analysis for detection of azole resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017; 61(10):e00906-17.
  27. Mohamadi J, Havasian MR, Panahi J, Pakzad I. Antifungal drug resistance pattern of Candida spp isolated from vaginitis in Ilam-Iran during 2013-2014. Bioinformation. 2015; 11(4):203-6.
  28. Goldman M, Cloud GA, Smedema M, LeMonte A, Connolly P, McKinsey DS. Does long-term itraconazole prophylaxis result in in vitro azole resistance in mucosal Candida albicans isolates from persons with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection?. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000; 44(6):1585-7.