Oral Candida colonization and anti-fungal susceptibility pattern in patients with hematological malignancy

Document Type : Original Articles


1 Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Center for Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran



Background and Purpose: Candidiasis is considered as one of the most important fungal infections in hematological malignancy. Candidiasis is considered as the most important cause of disease and mortality in hematological malignancy and antifungal prophylaxis is important (remove highlighted text).
Objectives: The aim of study is to identify and evaluated antifungal susceptibility pattern in patients with hematological malignancy
Material and Methods: In this study, samples were collected from the oral cavity of 100 patients and Candida colonization was confirmed by fungal culture. Isolated Candida strains were identified by ITS-PCR. In vitro antifungal susceptibility tests against fluconazole (replace “fluconazole” with “azoles”), amphotericinB and caspofungin were performed according to CLSI M27-A3/S4.
Results: Demographics, comorbidities, distribution of Candida species, antifungal susceptibility were analyzed. Study participants included 100 patients. The mean age of patients was 15.48% ±48.74 years were in the range of 17 to 84 years and in terms of sex distribution, 64% were male and 36% were female. In terms of the distribution of underlying hematologic malignancy, 27% had lymphoma. The most commonly isolated species among patients were 49% C. albicans, 31% C. glabrata, 10% Co-colonization of C. albicans and C. with C. glabrata .The overall resistance of C.albicance was %5 to fluconazole%2 to amphotericinB.C. glabrata showed %11 resistance to fluconazole and was susceptible to amphotericinB.All candida spp.isolated from patients were susceptible to caspofungin.
Conclusions: The high rate of colonization of Candida species, especially the significant increase in the frequency of Candida glabrata in patients with blood malignancies and the gradual increase in resistance to fluconazole, necessitate a change in the use of antifungal drugs for the prevention and experimental treatment of hematological malignancy.



Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) or invasive fungal diseases (IFD) are the most important causes of death from 29% to 90% [ 1 - 3 ]. Oral candidiasis is a fungal infection in the mouth caused by Candida species (spp.). Chemotherapy is one of the most important predisposing factors for fungal infections in malignancies [ 4 ]. With prolonged colonization during chemotherapy, the likelihood of invasive candidiasis with the same colonized isolates increases [ 5 ].

Azole-resistant Candida colonization may affect mortality since IFIs with the same organism could occur [ 6 ]. Fungal infection is one of the most important causes of disease and mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies [ 1 , 3 , 7 , 8 ]. The risk of IFIs in these patients is increasing [ 8 ], and despite recent advances in the diagnosis and management of IFD, high morbidity and mortality rates are still reported [ 6 , 9 , 10 ]. Hematologic malignancies mainly include acute leukemia and lymphomas, as well as multiple myeloma. These malignancies with or without neutropenia are risk factors for IFD [ 5 , 6 ]. Although C. albicans is considered to be the leading cause of most Candida-related IFDs, a shift toward non-albicans infections has been identified. Among the various species of non-albicans, some are concerned, such as C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis, due to different levels of antifungal resistance [ 11 ]. The evaluation of different fungal species is essential in fungal infections. Identification and detailed analysis of species susceptible to antifungal drugs, especially in immunosuppression patients are considered to determine the appropriate treatment protocol. This study aimed to assess oropharyngeal Candida colonization and anti-fungal susceptibility pattern in patients with hematological malignancy.

Materials and Methods

Study design

This applied cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 patients admitted to the Hematology Ward of Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran, in 2021. Risk factors including demographic characteristics and underlying diseases (history of diabetes mellitus, immunodeficiency diseases, and rheumatic diseases, as well as head and neck radiotherapy) were collected through interviews with patients or clinical evidence. The samples were collected using swaps from the dorsal surface of the tongue and oropharynx. Patients with a history of non-hematologic malignancies were excluded from the study.

Identification of species

Species were cultured on Chrom agar medium (Sigma-Aldrich; USA) at 35°C for two days. PCR was used to differentiate between C. albicans complex and non-C. albicans spp. DNA was extracted from fresh 24-hour-colony cultures according to the protocol. The final solution (DNA pattern) was kept at -20°C until use. For the identification of non-C. albicans strains, the ITS regions of the isolated rDNA gene were amplified using the following primers [ 12 ]:



Antifungal susceptibility testing

Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed according to the CLSI-M60 protocol and the method described previously [ 13 ].

Before susceptibility testing, all isolates were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA; Merck, Germany) media, and the tests were performed in 96-well microplates. The final concentration of yeast suspensions was 0.5×103 to 2.5×103 CFU/mL. All antifungal drugs were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Serial two-fold dilutions of fluconazole (FCZ), amphotericin B (AMB), and caspofungin (CAS) were prepared with RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen, Gibco) and buffered to pH=7.0 with 0.165 M Morpholine Propane Sulfonic Acid (MOPS) buffer (Sigma, USA) [ 14 ]. Yeast suspensions were diluted into RPMI in microplates incubated at 35°C for 48 h. Subsequently, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined, and the MIC breakpoints of antifungal agents were defined as follows: CAS (susceptible MIC≤0.25 µg/mL; resistant MIC≥1 µg/mL), FCZ (susceptible MIC≤8 µg/mL; resistant MIC>8 µg/mL), and AMB (susceptible MIC≤1 µg/mL; resistant MIC>1 µg/mL)[ 14 ].

Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) was used as quality control. It is worth mentioning that all tests were carried out in triplicate.

Statistic analysis

Quantitative data were expressed as mean±SD, and the percentage was used for stratified qualitative variables. Comparisons between quantitative variables were performed by t-test or Mann-Whitney test, and the qualitative variables were compared utilizing the Chi-square test. The data were analyzed in SPSS software (version 23), and a P-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical approval

The project received approval from the Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (code: IR.SBMU.MSP.REC. 1400.070).


Demographic Data

This study was conducted on 100 patients with a mean age of 15.48%±48.74 years (age range: 17-84 years). Regarding gender distribution, the majority (64%) of the patients were male. In terms of the distribution of underlying hematologic malignancy, 27% of the cases had lymphoma. Furthermore, 20% of the cases were involved in neutropenia, and 4% of the participants had underlying diabetes mellitus

Distribution of Candida species

Candida spp. were distributed as C. albicans complex (n=49), C. glabrata (n=31), co-colonization of C. albicans complex and C. glabrata (n=10), simultaneous colonization with C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis (n=4), colonization with C. glabrata and C. tropicalis (n=4), and colonization with C. tropicalis (n=2). The types of hematologic malignancies in the studied patients are presented in Table 1, and the highest frequency is related to lymphoma (n=27). There is a significant relationship between hematologic malignancy and colonized fungal species (P=0.03).

Hematological Malignancies Candida species
C. tropicalis (%) C. albicans complex (%) C. glabrata (%)
ALL 0 7 4
AML 0 10 11
CLL 1 0 6
CML 0 3 3
ITP 0 1 0
MDS 0 1 2
MM 0 9 3
PNH 0 1 0
Aplastic Anemia 0 1 1
Hemolytic Anemia 0 2 0
Lymphoma 1 10 16
Myelofibrosis 0 1 1
Workup for Malignancy 0 3 3
Total 2 49 49
Table 1.Distribution of patients based on hematological malignancy and fungal species.

Antifungal prophylaxis

The most commonly used drug for prophylaxis was FCZ (26%) and 53% of patients did not receive any prophylaxis. There is a significant relationship between the use of FCZ as prophylaxis and colonization of each species (P=0.000) and C.glabrata was the most common specieces among whom receiving FCZ prophylaxis. In total, 47% of patients received antifungal prophylaxis, which included FCZ (26%) and voriconazole (VCZ) (11%). The resistance and susceptibility of each cloned species to FCZ, CAS, and AMB are presented in Table 2.

Candida species Antifungal Breakpoints, µg/mL Number of Isolates
C. albicans complex (n = 49) Fluconazole R≥8 5
SDD=4 11
S≤2 33
Amphotericin B R>1 2
I 10
S≤1 37
Caspofungin R≥1 0
I=0.5 0
S≤0.25 49
C. glabrata (n = 49) Fluconazole R≥64 11
SDD≤32 38
NM 0
Amphotericin B R>1 0
I 3
S≤1 46
Caspofungin R≥0.5 0
I=0.25 0
S≤0.12 49
C. tropicalis (n = 2) Fluconazole R≥8 0
SDD=4 0
S≤2 2
Amphotericin B R>1 0
I 1
S≤1 1
Caspofungin R≥1 0
I=0.5 0
S≤0.25 2
Table 2.Anti-fungal susceptibility pattern in patients with hematological malignancy

C. albicans complex (5%) and C. glabrata (11%) resistance to FCZ is significant. The most common infections by various fungal species were due to C. albicans complex (49%), C. glabrata (31%), simultaneous C. albicans complex and C. glabrata (10%), simultaneous C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis (4%), C. glabrata and C. tropicalis (4%), and C. tropicalis (2%). Among all patients, 15% had a history of bone marrow transplantation in which C. glabrata complex (6%) and C. albicans (9%) were isolated. In patients without a history of transplantation, 43% C. glabrata, 40% C. albicans, and 2% C. tropicalis were detected. There was a significant relationship between the presence and absence of a history of transplantation and the colonized species.


Invasive Candida infections are the most common types of IFD in hematologic cancer centers without the supervision of antifungal prophylaxis [ 15 , 16 ]. Fungal infections are life-threatening and common in patients with hematologic malignancies. Despite the use of various antifungal drugs in such patients, due to their immunosuppressive status, especially in cases undergoing chemotherapy or transplantation, as well as late diagnosis of such infections, we face significant morbidity and mortality among these patients seeking fungal infections. This is especially common at older ages. Identification of fungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies, as well as antifungal drugs with the highest drug sensitivity, is essential to preserve the lives of many of these patients. In this regard, this study evaluated Candida colonization in patients with various hematologic malignancies admitted to the Hematology Ward of Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran, in 2021. In our study, 20% of the patients were involved with neutropenia which is a serious complication that can occur during the treatment of hematologic malignancies and sometimes be due to fungal infection [ 17 ].

For high-risk patients, long-term neutropenia (decreased neutrophil count for at least 10 consecutive days) is the most important risk factor for the development and spread of fungal infections [ 9 ]. The probability of developing fungal infections after the diagnosis of acute leukemia is estimated to be about 11% in 100 days [ 11 ]. Patients with hematologic malignancies have been diagnosed with 35% mortality due to fungal infections [ 10 ]. In a study in Australia, 1.33% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia developed IFD within 12 months of being diagnosed with cancer [ 18 ]. The literature concerning the epidemiology of fungal infection in patients with hematologic malignancies in the Asia-Pacific region is limited [ 3 , 7 , 8 ]. The increase in the incidence of fungal infections in these patients has been associated with increases in hospitalization time and the cost of treatment[ 19 ]. Continuous monitoring of changes in the epidemiology of IFDs as an important part of antifungal monitoring programs requires regular and accurate evaluation. This assessment is especially important in high-risk environments, such as oncology centers [ 11 ]. In this study, the most common fungal species detected were C. albicans complex, followed by C. glabrata and C. glabrata colonization increased by prophylactic interventions. Hamzavi et al. evaluated Candida colonization using the samples of oral, urine, nasal, and stool in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. In this study, the frequency of C. albicans complex was higher than that of other species (60%) [ 11 ].

In a study performed by Mardani et al., the frequency of C. albicans was estimated at 91.6% [ 4 ], and the frequency of Candida spp. was higher than that of other species in a study performed by Keymaram et al. [ 20 ]. Oropharyngeal Candida colonization was more prevalent in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, compared to healthy adults, and the dominant species was C. glabrata in a study carried out by Shirazian et al. conducted from 2016 to 2017 in Tehran, Iran [ 21 ].

Prophylactic antifungal treatment is effective in a wide range of organisms and is available intravenously and orally [ 22 ]. These species show higher levels of resistance to antifungal interventions and are associated with higher mortality from C. albicans [ 23 , 24 ]. In our study, 46% of patients received antifungal prophylaxis, and FCZ obtained the highest consumption among other prophylaxis (26%). The proper use of antifungals in vulnerable populations is important for the treatment of IFI [ 25 , 26 ].

The findings of a study by Sakamoto et al. show that the optimal prophylactic dose of FCZ in patients with hematologic malignancy is needed for the complete prevention of invasive candidiasis [ 27 ]. The prognostic model identifies patients at high risk for FCZ failure, indicating the importance of paying more attention to personalizing candidiasis treatment [ 28 ].

Epidemiological trends indicate the prevalence of non-albicans Candida in patients with hematologic malignancy [ 29 ]. In the last decade, an increase was observed in the prevalence of C. glabrata fungi in some cases [ 26 ]. In this study, C. glabrata's resistance to prophylactic interventions was significant, compared to a previous study in the same center [ 5 ] where C. albicans' resistance to FCZ was 2.7%. In the present study, this ratio was obtained at 5%. In a previous study, there was no C. glabrata resistance to FCZ; however, in the present study, increased drug resistance to FCZ was observed (11%). The main reason for these changes could be the use of FCZ as the first-line treatment in these patients, the emergence of resistance due to the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and the utilization of potent malignancy treatment protocols. Tracing serious infections and developing guidelines for infection control strategies and antifungal monitoring programs are essential [ 23 ]. Antifungal drugs, such as FCZ, itraconazole, posaconazole, CAS, and micafungin are all recommended with many consensus and guidelines for antifungal prophylaxis. Accordingly, it is of crucial significance to predict IFD classification and review new drugs, pharmacokinetics, as well as integrated, more scientific, appropriate, and effective prevention routes [ 30 ]. One of the limitations of our study was the small number of patients, which reduced the power of statistical comparisons.


The high frequency of colonization of Candida spp., especially the significant increase in the frequency of C. glabrata in patients with hematologic malignancies and the gradual increase in FCZ resistance, changes in the use of antifungal drugs for prophylaxis, and empiric therapy in hematologic malignancies should be considered. Therefore, risk factors for species distribution, patterns of antifungal susceptibility of Candida isolates that cause candidiasis, and mortality risk factors should be evaluated and considered for more effective outcomes in antifungal therapy.



Authors’ contribution

S.A. and M. TS. designed the research, collected the data, interpreted data, drafted, and revised the manuscript. E.L. and M.F. performed the laboratory tests and reviewed the analyses and the final version of the manuscript. S.A. interpreted the data, revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, and approved the final version. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

Not Applicable.

Financial disclosure

This study was financially supported by the Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU), Tehran, Iran.


  1. Slavin M, van Hal S, Sorrell TC, Lee A, Marriott DJ, Daveson K, et al. Invasive infections due to filamentous fungi other than Aspergillus: epidemiology and determinants of mortality. C Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015; 21(5):1-10.
  2. Nivoix Y, Velten M, Letscher-Bru V, Moghaddam A, Natarajan-Ame S, Fohrer C, et al. Factors associated with overall and attributable mortality in invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47(9):1176-84.
  3. Yasu T, Sakurai K, Akazawa M. Invasive fungal disease in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Japan: a retrospective database study. Curr Oncol. 2022; 29(5):3242-51.
  4. Mardani M, Abolghasemi S, Darvishnia D, Lotfali E, Ghasemi R, Rabiei M, et al. Oral Candidiasis in hematological malignancy patients: Identification and antifungal susceptibility patterns of isolates. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2020; 13(8):1-6.
  5. Donnelly JP, Chen SC, Kauffman CA, Steinbach WJ, Baddley JW, Verweij PE, et al. Revision and update of the consensus definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 71(6):1367-76.
  6. Hesstvedt L, Gaustad P, Muller F, Andersen CT, Brunborg C, Mylvaganam H, et al. The impact of age on risk assessment, therapeutic practice and outcome in candidemia. Infect Dis (Lond). 2019; 51(6):425-34.
  7. Kurosawa M, Yonezumi M, Hashino S, Tanaka J, Nishio M, Kaneda M, et al. Epidemiology and treatment outcome of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancies. Int J Hematol. 2012; 96(6):748-57.
  8. Hsu L, Lee DG, Yeh SP, Bhurani D, Khanh BQ, Low CY, et al. Epidemiology of invasive fungal diseases among patients with haematological disorders in the Asia-Pacific: a prospective observational study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015; 21(6):7-11.
  9. Krcmery Jr VC, Babela R. Mortality associated with breakthrough candidemia among patients with and those without cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2002; 35(7):898-899.
  10. Caira M, Trecarichi EM, Tumbarello M, Leone G, Pagano L. Uncommon yeast infections in hematological patients: from diagnosis to treatment. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011; 9(11):1067-75.
  11. Hamzavi SS, Amanati A, Badiee P, Kadivar MR, Jafarian H, Ghasemi F, et al. Changing face of Candida colonization pattern in pediatric patients with hematological malignancy during repeated hospitalizations, results of a prospective observational study (2016–2017) in shiraz, Iran. BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19(1):1-9.
  12. Lotfali E, Mardani M, Abolghasemi S, Darvishnia D, Rabiei MM, Ghasemi R, et al. Isolation of Candida africana in oral candidiasis: First report among cancer patients in Iran. Curr Med Mycol. 2020; 6(2):58-62.
  13. Wayne P. Performance standards for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. CLSI supplement. CLSI supplement. 1st ed. 2017, M60, 2017.
  14. Lotfali E, Kordbacheh P, Mirhendi H, Zaini F, Ghajari A, Mohammadi R, et al. Antifungal susceptibility analysis of clinical isolates of Candida parapsilosis in Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2016; 45(3):322-8.
  15. Lamoth F, Lockhart SR, Berkow EL, Calandra T. Changes in the epidemiological landscape of invasive candidiasis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018; 73(1):4-13.
  16. Haddadi P, Zareifar S, Badiee P, Alborzi A, Mokhtari M, Zomorodian K, et al. Yeast colonization and drug susceptibility pattern in the pediatric patients with neutropenia. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014; 7(9):1-6.
  17. Saito AM, Yoshida I, Tanaka S, Sawamura M, Hidaka M, Yoshida S, et al. Efficacy of Intravenous Itraconazole Versus Liposomal Amphotericin B as Empirical Antifungal Therapy in Hematological Malignancy with Persistent Fever and Neutropenia: Study Protocol for a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Non-inferiority Trial. Kurume Med J. 2021; 66(4):239-46.
  18. Valentine JC, Morrissey CO, Tacey MA, Liew D, Patil S, Peleg AY, et al. A population-based analysis of invasive fungal disease in haematology-oncology patients using data linkage of state-wide registries and administrative databases: 2005-2016. BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19(1):1-11.
  19. Menzin J, Meyers JL, Friedman M, Perfect JR, Langston AA, Danna RP, et al. Mortality, length of hospitalization, and costs associated with invasive fungal infections in high-risk patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009; 66(19):1711-7.
  20. Keymaram M, Falahati M, Farahyar S, Lotfali E, Abolghasemi S, Mahmoudi S, et al. Anti-biofilm properties of eucalyptol in combination with antifungals against Candida albicans isolates in patients with hematological malignancy. Arch Microbiol. 2022; 204(6):1-8.
  21. Shirazian S, Manifar S, Safaei Nodehi R, Shabani M. Oropharyngeal candida colonization in patients with acute myeloid Leukemia. Front Dent. 2020; 17(6):1-6.
  22. Lee CH, Lin C, Ho CL, Lin JC. Primary fungal prophylaxis in hematological malignancy: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018; 62(8): 355-18.
  23. Adhikary R, Malavalli Venkatesh B, Joshi S, Aravinda A. Candidemia in a Pediatric Population: A 10-year Indian Study. Pediatr Inf Dis. 2021; 3(1):1-8.
  24. Rajendran R, Sherry L, Deshpande A, Johnson EM, Hanson M, Williams C, et al. A prospective surveillance study of candidaemia: epidemiology, risk factors, antifungal treatment and outcome in hospitalized patients. Front Microbiol. 2016; 7:1-8.
  25. Yüksek SK, Özkaya Parlakay A, Gülhan B, Yaralı N, Yaşar Özbek N, Tezer H. Clinical experience of antifungal combination therapy for invasive fungal infections in pediatric hematological malignancy patients. Authorea. 2021;1-8.
  26. Kobayashi R, Hori D, Sano H, Suzuki D, Kishimoto K, Kobayashi K. Risk factors for invasive fungal infection in children and adolescents with hematologic and malignant diseases: a 10-year analysis in a single institute in Japan. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018; 37(12):1282-5.
  27. Sakamoto Y, Isono H, Enoki Y, Taguchi K, Miyazaki T, Kunimoto H, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing optimization of prophylactic fluconazole in Japanese patients with hematological malignancy. J Fungi (Basel). 2021; 7(11):1-13.
  28. Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Harrington R, Azie N, Yang H, Li N, Zhao J, et al. A risk score for fluconazole failure among patients with candidemia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017; 61(5):1-16.
  29. Alves J, Palma P, Azevedo D, Rello J. Candidemia in the patient with malignancy. Hosp Pract (1995). 2018; 46(5):246-52.
  30. Li Y, Yu L. Current status and future perspectives of primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematological malignancies-review. Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi. 2017; 25(2):627-32.
Volume 8, Issue 3
September 2022
Pages 18-22
  • Receive Date: 25 May 2022
  • Revise Date: 29 September 2022
  • Accept Date: 30 September 2022
  • First Publish Date: 30 September 2022